Labour’s manifesto pledges would be ‘transformational’ for Britain’s housing emergency, says Shelter

Support us and go ad-free

A radical shake-up of the housing system, which treats homes “as financial assets rather than places to live”, has been proposed by Labour.

Alongside plans for a new council and social house building revolution, the party has also made pledges around capping “runaway” private rents, a holiday homes levy and giving councils powers to buy back homes from private landlords.

.@UKLabour‘s manifesto plan would be transformational for the #HousingEmergency🏠🚨 in this country.

Their ambitious plans show housing is now – rightly – one of the hot topics of this #GE2019, and lays the gauntlet down to the other parties, including the Conservatives.

— Shelter (@Shelter) November 20, 2019

The plans follow various pledges in recent years to tackle the housing crisis.

Here is a look at what has been said – and the challenges politicians face:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

– What has Labour pledged?

Councils will be given powers and funding to buy back homes from private landlords and Right to Buy would be ended to “stop the haemorrhage of low cost homes” under Labour’s plans.

There would also be a levy on overseas companies buying housing, while giving local people “first dibs” on new homes built in their area.

In the private rented sector, “runaway rents” would be capped with inflation and cities would be handed powers to cap rents further.

But David Smith, policy director for the Residential Landlords Association, described the plans for rent controls as “nonsense”, adding: “The Office for National Statistics has shown that rents are increasing by less than inflation.”

New “renters’ unions” will be created for tenants to defend their rights under a Labour government.

There would also be a new levy on second homes used as holiday homes “to help deal with the homelessness crisis”.

Labour wants a council and social housing “revolution”, constructing up to 150,000 homes a year.

It proposes to build 100,000 council homes a year by the end of its first parliament.

A further 50,000 “genuinely affordable homes” would be built each year through housing associations by the end of the same period.

– What have other parties said?

The Conservative Party says it will deliver a million more homes in the next five years.

The party has also vowed to introduce “lifetime rental deposits” so down payments can be transferred from one property to the next – before the deposit from the first property is repaid.

It would also review new ways to support home ownership following the end of the Help to Buy scheme in 2023.

Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrats say they plan to invest in boosting the Local Housing Allowance by linking it to average rents in each area.

– What have government ministers previously promised?

In the autumn Budget in 2017, a package of new policies was set out to raise housing supply, with the aim of reaching around 300,000 a year.

Some commentators have pointed out that the Conservatives’ election ambition to deliver a million more homes in the next five years may give the impression of a downgrading of previous targets – as it implies an average of 200,000 new homes per year.

Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, has said: “The commitment to only build 200,000 a year when the Government’s own target is in fact 300,000 shows that even the Conservatives don’t think they’d be able to achieve this goal.”

– What other challenges are there?

Housing affordability in some areas has worsened as prices have surged faster than wage growth.

Recent research from Halifax found that homes in some parts of Britain typically cost more than 18 times key workers’ average annual wages.

The average nurse, teacher, paramedic, police officer or firefighter can only afford to own a home in 8% of towns across Britain, according to Halifax.

It said average house prices have surged by 32% between 2014 and 2019 – more than four times average key worker annual earnings growth of 7%.

– What do others involved in the housing sector say?

The Home Builders Federation (HBF) has called for policies that ensure enough land comes forward in the right places quickly and efficiently, and more support for smaller builders.

Housing charity Shelter wants to see more investment in social housing.

Shelter said all political parties should commit to delivering at least 90,000 social homes a year over the next parliament “to provide a real solution to the housing crisis”.

– What do councils say?

Councils argue they should play a leading role.

The Local Government Association wants “a renaissance in council house building”, which it argues could be achieved through giving councils more powers and reforming the Right to Buy scheme.

Right to Buy, which enables people to buy council homes at a discount, has been blamed by some for adding to the shortage of social housing.

The recent awarding of the Riba Stirling prize for architecture to Goldsmith Street – a council estate in Norwich – highlighted the issue of council house funding.

Local councillor Gail Harris was quoted in The Guardian as saying: “Winning this prestigious award shows that it is possible to build fantastic new council homes, despite the challenges posed by central government cuts and restrictions around Right to Buy receipts.”

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Because of the publication of the Labour Party manifesto, there is mass right wing moronic trolling right now! The usual poison and lies. Magic money trees, Venezuela, Greece! You know it all. But if you come across an imbecile at work, or in the street, who wants to spout all this vacuous drivel at you, tell them this interesting little fact. In 1990, The West German Government took on the full reunification with another country. It cost them 2 trillion Euros. The monumental task of rebuilding a totally dead, moribund region, took massive investments and infrastructure and people power. At the time Germany, was almost identical economically to us. So? Did it destroy them and bankrupt them for generations? No! On the contrary, they got two economic booms to our one, and are in pretty good shape right now, despite (or because of) being in The E.U. So the real truth is, it’s never about the money, the cost it takes to rebuild a country, it’s about the sheer political will and cojones to do it!

    2. I think the main reason there are so many houses boarded up is because the more houses taken out of habitation, the higher the prices of those still in use. So not only do ordinary people go poorer so the rich can have more money, but ordinary people are becoming homeless so the rich can have higher-priced houses. It also means landlords can earn a living in an economy where otherwise there’s no jobs, while property speculators make a killing and tax dodgers “rest” money in property to defer a tax bill.

      The thing is it’s not really wealth most homeowners can access, unless they own another home they can move into, or they downsize and pocket the difference, because they have to pay more for the next house they buy, or they have to pay higher rent if they don’t buy. Owning a house that increases in value sounds good but (i) most of us couldn’t pocket the increase in value and (ii) its value could make you liable for death duties–for which ironically your survivors may have to sell the house to pay the bill.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.