HS2 critic identifies alternative rail schemes

The Canary

A list of potential improvements to mainline rail services as an alternative to HS2 has been unveiled by the deputy chair of a government-commissioned review into the high speed railway.

Lord Berkeley claimed electrification, extended platforms and longer trains are “quick wins” which would boost journeys in the North and the Midlands.

He identified the centres of Manchester, Sheffield, Birmingham and Leeds as having the “greatest potential” for improvements, due to the level of overcrowding on rush hour trains.

The Labour peer believes the disruption caused by the 21 projects would be “small”, whereas if HS2 goes ahead then passengers and motorists face “severe and long lasting” delays due to construction work.

He said: “Quick wins on the rail services in the North and Midlands are essential, as part of a 20-year rolling programme of improvements for commuters.

“Most of these are needed whether HS2 gets built or not and are likely to bring greater economic benefit to the local economy of these regions than the intercity improvements proposed by HS2.”

He submitted the list to the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee.

The projects include:

– Five new stations between Wolverhampton and Walsall
– Lengthen platforms at Leeds station
– Increase the number of tracks running through Manchester Piccadilly

This comes after he published a hard-hitting 70-page dissenting report into HS2 earlier this month, in which he accused those in charge of the scheme of “fiddling the figures”.

Parliament was “seriously misled” over the costs of HS2, which would be poor value for money and bad for the environment, he added.

The review, led by former HS2 Ltd chairman Doug Oakervee, was leaked last week.

It recommended that “on balance” the government should go ahead with the railway, despite warning that its cost could reach £106 billion.

The project was allocated £56 billion in 2015.

The National Audit Office recently stated that the Department for Transport set the available funding for the first phase in 2013, when there was only a “basic” design for the project.

Transport secretary Grant Shapps has said the government will make a decision on whether to go ahead with HS2 in “weeks rather than months”.

Some £8 billion has already been spent on the scheme.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Problem with the UK with these infrastructure schemes is that rail building cowboys and con merchants are able to climb onto bandwagons loaded with £billions by which to fleece rail users. Look at the South coast’s HS1 ‘innovation’ as an example and your’ll see high ticket prices on HS1 and former cheaper traditional routes are horrendously inconvenienced with a stop-go-and-slower-timetable in order that HS1 holds court on the fast non-stop lines to London.

      1. In other words – the new fast non-stop HS1 or HS2 trains requires former trains travelling to same destination, as HS1 and HS2, are remodelled to be even more slower and station-stopping so as to encourage higher ticket pricing on direct non-stopping trains which HS1 and HS2 represent.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.