HS2 critic identifies alternative rail schemes

Support us and go ad-free

A list of potential improvements to mainline rail services as an alternative to HS2 has been unveiled by the deputy chair of a government-commissioned review into the high speed railway.

Lord Berkeley claimed electrification, extended platforms and longer trains are “quick wins” which would boost journeys in the North and the Midlands.

He identified the centres of Manchester, Sheffield, Birmingham and Leeds as having the “greatest potential” for improvements, due to the level of overcrowding on rush hour trains.

The Labour peer believes the disruption caused by the 21 projects would be “small”, whereas if HS2 goes ahead then passengers and motorists face “severe and long lasting” delays due to construction work.

He said: “Quick wins on the rail services in the North and Midlands are essential, as part of a 20-year rolling programme of improvements for commuters.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

“Most of these are needed whether HS2 gets built or not and are likely to bring greater economic benefit to the local economy of these regions than the intercity improvements proposed by HS2.”

He submitted the list to the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee.

The projects include:

– Five new stations between Wolverhampton and Walsall
– Lengthen platforms at Leeds station
– Increase the number of tracks running through Manchester Piccadilly

This comes after he published a hard-hitting 70-page dissenting report into HS2 earlier this month, in which he accused those in charge of the scheme of “fiddling the figures”.

Parliament was “seriously misled” over the costs of HS2, which would be poor value for money and bad for the environment, he added.

The review, led by former HS2 Ltd chairman Doug Oakervee, was leaked last week.

It recommended that “on balance” the government should go ahead with the railway, despite warning that its cost could reach £106 billion.

The project was allocated £56 billion in 2015.

The National Audit Office recently stated that the Department for Transport set the available funding for the first phase in 2013, when there was only a “basic” design for the project.

Transport secretary Grant Shapps has said the government will make a decision on whether to go ahead with HS2 in “weeks rather than months”.

Some £8 billion has already been spent on the scheme.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Problem with the UK with these infrastructure schemes is that rail building cowboys and con merchants are able to climb onto bandwagons loaded with £billions by which to fleece rail users. Look at the South coast’s HS1 ‘innovation’ as an example and your’ll see high ticket prices on HS1 and former cheaper traditional routes are horrendously inconvenienced with a stop-go-and-slower-timetable in order that HS1 holds court on the fast non-stop lines to London.

      1. In other words – the new fast non-stop HS1 or HS2 trains requires former trains travelling to same destination, as HS1 and HS2, are remodelled to be even more slower and station-stopping so as to encourage higher ticket pricing on direct non-stopping trains which HS1 and HS2 represent.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.