HS2 critic identifies alternative rail schemes

Support us and go ad-free

A list of potential improvements to mainline rail services as an alternative to HS2 has been unveiled by the deputy chair of a government-commissioned review into the high speed railway.

Lord Berkeley claimed electrification, extended platforms and longer trains are “quick wins” which would boost journeys in the North and the Midlands.

He identified the centres of Manchester, Sheffield, Birmingham and Leeds as having the “greatest potential” for improvements, due to the level of overcrowding on rush hour trains.

The Labour peer believes the disruption caused by the 21 projects would be “small”, whereas if HS2 goes ahead then passengers and motorists face “severe and long lasting” delays due to construction work.

He said: “Quick wins on the rail services in the North and Midlands are essential, as part of a 20-year rolling programme of improvements for commuters.

Read on...

“Most of these are needed whether HS2 gets built or not and are likely to bring greater economic benefit to the local economy of these regions than the intercity improvements proposed by HS2.”

He submitted the list to the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee.

The projects include:

– Five new stations between Wolverhampton and Walsall
– Lengthen platforms at Leeds station
– Increase the number of tracks running through Manchester Piccadilly

This comes after he published a hard-hitting 70-page dissenting report into HS2 earlier this month, in which he accused those in charge of the scheme of “fiddling the figures”.

Parliament was “seriously misled” over the costs of HS2, which would be poor value for money and bad for the environment, he added.

The review, led by former HS2 Ltd chairman Doug Oakervee, was leaked last week.

It recommended that “on balance” the government should go ahead with the railway, despite warning that its cost could reach £106 billion.

The project was allocated £56 billion in 2015.

The National Audit Office recently stated that the Department for Transport set the available funding for the first phase in 2013, when there was only a “basic” design for the project.

Transport secretary Grant Shapps has said the government will make a decision on whether to go ahead with HS2 in “weeks rather than months”.

Some £8 billion has already been spent on the scheme.

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Problem with the UK with these infrastructure schemes is that rail building cowboys and con merchants are able to climb onto bandwagons loaded with £billions by which to fleece rail users. Look at the South coast’s HS1 ‘innovation’ as an example and your’ll see high ticket prices on HS1 and former cheaper traditional routes are horrendously inconvenienced with a stop-go-and-slower-timetable in order that HS1 holds court on the fast non-stop lines to London.

      1. In other words – the new fast non-stop HS1 or HS2 trains requires former trains travelling to same destination, as HS1 and HS2, are remodelled to be even more slower and station-stopping so as to encourage higher ticket pricing on direct non-stopping trains which HS1 and HS2 represent.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.