Canary Workers’ Co-op Canary Workers’ Co-op

Dunblane massacre victim’s father brands opposition to firearms ban ‘appalling’

An attempt by ministers to obstruct a firearms ban a day after the Dunblane massacre has been condemned as “appalling” by the father of one of the victims.

Thomas Hamilton shot and killed 16 pupils and their teacher in the gym hall of Dunblane Primary School on 13 March 1996 before shooting himself.

Newly declassified Cabinet minutes from the following day, as reported in the Times Scotland, show ministers expected to come under pressure for a public inquiry into gun control.

They were concerned it would produce “unwelcome” results and agreed to chose the judge leading the inquiry “carefully”.

Dunblane memorial
A memorial plaque commemorating the victims of the shooting (Andrew Milligan/PA)

Mick North became a spokesperson for the Dunblane parents after his five-year-old daughter Sophie was murdered by Hamilton. He was instrumental in the campaign to ban handguns and told the newspaper the newly released minutes are “shocking”.

Read on...

“To find out they were saying this within 24 hours of our children being killed is just appalling,” he said.

“Their intention was to ensure that public opinion was to be kept at bay.

“I always suspected the government wanted to appoint a judge whose recommendations would be unlikely to rock the boat but to see it written down on paper really is shocking.”

He added: “I regard it as vindication for people like me that we managed to change enough minds so that the gun laws ultimately were changed.”

Dunblane School Shootings
Two children stand in front of a floral tribute to the victims of the Dunblane massacre (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

The minutes, now in the National Archives, show the Cabinet expressed sympathy but also concern.

“Although there would undoubtedly be strong pressure for a high level judicial inquiry there was a danger that it would become a focus for those who argued that firearms controls should be tightened further and that school security should be enhanced well beyond what would be sensible,” they stated.

“The incident did not suggest a need for substantive change to firearms law.

“What happened in Dunblane was the kind of tragedy against which no society could insure completely.

“There was a risk that the judge in charge of the inquiry would come under pressure to make recommendations which would be unwelcome to the government but would be hard to resist.”

Dunblane Major/Blair flowers
Then-prime minister John Major laying flowers in Dunblane a day after the Cabinet meeting detailed in the declassified papers (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

Noting previous inquiries had produced “awkward” findings, the minutes added: “The Secretary of State would be able to appoint the judge to undertake the inquiry and intended to do so carefully, perhaps appointing Lord Cullen if he were available.”

A “clear majority” of then-prime minister John Major’s Cabinet opposed a ban on handguns.

Lord Cullen led a public inquiry into the massacre but stopped short of recommending handguns be outlawed.

But a campaign by bereaved parents including North was successful in securing the ban.

We’re a thorn in the side of the establishment, but we can’t do it without your help

Your fight is our fight. But as many of you will know, speaking truth to power has never been easy, especially for a small, independent media outlet such as the Canary. We have weathered many attempts to silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media. Now more than ever, we need your support.

We don’t have fancy offices, and our entire staff works remotely. Almost all of our income is spent on paying the people who make the Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our team and enables us to continue to do what we do: disrupt power, and amplify people.

But we can’t do this without you. So please, if you appreciate our work, can you help us continue the fight?

Canary Workers’ Co-op Support us