PM wants driverless trains to be condition of future TfL bailout

Support us and go ad-free

Boris Johnson has said driverless trains should be a condition of a future bailout of Transport for London (TfL).

The government has given TfL a £1.6bn package to continue running services after a collapse in revenue in May 2020 due to the coronavirus lockdown. But that funding will run out in September 2020.

“Let’s not be the prisoners of the unions”

On a visit to a site in Goole, East Riding of Yorkshire, where tech giant Siemens will open a rail manufacturing facility in 2022, Boris Johnson told reporters:

You can run these trains without the need for somebody to be sitting in the driver’s cab the whole time.

So what I will be saying to the London transport authority is let’s take advantage of this technological leap forward, let’s not be the prisoners of the unions anymore, let’s go to driverless trains, and let’s make that a condition of the funding settlement for Transport for London this autumn.

“As always, Boris Johnson is talking nonsense”

Finn Brennan, organiser on London Underground for train drivers’ union Aslef, said:

As always, Boris Johnson is talking nonsense about driverless trains.

Read on...

Slashing Government funding to TfL means that they cannot afford the signalling upgrade and other technology that would be needed for driverless trains.

While pretending to support a ‘great leap forward’, the Prime Minister’s policies are actually preventing any progress with transport in the capital.

They mean that Londoners will suffer years of delays and overcrowding in the future.

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Why would the government make it a condition of bailing-out a private company that they must shed so many jobs – in fact all drivers’ jobs – when as a condition of all other bail-outs the government spoke of the condition it’s to save jobs?

      I think this demand comes from Transport for London. They’ve wanted for a long time to rid themselves of conductors and drivers. It’s easy enough for TfL to say, “Without funds London’s commerce and roads will grind to a stop. Oh, by the way! You’ll tell our workers that as part of the rescue package their jobs have to go.”

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.