Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
BBC finally apologises over use of racist term in news report
BBC director-general Tony Hall has apologised for a news report which contained a racist term.
More than 18,000 people complained to the BBC over the broadcast, which saw social affairs correspondent Fiona Lamdin repeat a racial slur allegedly used in a suspected racially-motivated attack in Bristol.
After the broadcaster initially defended the report, Hall said in a statement that the BBC “now accepts that we should have taken a different approach at the time of broadcast and we are very sorry for that”.
He said the report had caused “distress” to many, adding: “Every organisation should be able to acknowledge when it has made a mistake. We made one here.
“It is important for us to listen – and also to learn. And that is what we will continue to do.”
Read on...
The BBC would be changing its guidance on offensive language in its output, he added.
The story ran on the BBC News Channel and local news programme Points West on July 29, but the broadcaster stopped running the report which featured the offensive language later that day.
“It should be clear that the BBC’s intention was to highlight an alleged racist attack,” the outgoing director-general said.
“This is important journalism which the BBC should be reporting on and we will continue to do so.
“Yet despite these good intentions, I recognise that we have ended up creating distress amongst many people.”
The statement was issued after Hall held a meeting with BBC colleagues on the issue.
View this post on Instagram
On 8 August, BBC Radio 1xtra presenter Sideman announced that he was quitting the corporation over the broadcast.
Announcing the move on social media, he said the news report represented an “error of judgement”, adding it “feels like a slap in the face to our community”.
After Sideman, real name David Whitely, announced his decision, a BBC spokesman said on 8 August that while they were “aware that [the report] would cause offence” it was important to explain the alleged context of the incident.
The broadcaster has also previously revealed that the decision was taken by a team of people which included senior editorial figures.
On 6 August, the BBC said it had received 18,656 complaints over the incident.
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop
Fund us -
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Good. Now can we expect an apology from the countless musicians who feel it appropriate to use the term in their ‘music’? Or is context suddenly important when it comes to them?