Inquiry hears child abuse victims felt they ‘would not be believed’

Support us and go ad-free

Children in care homes allegedly abused by the late lord Janner did not immediately contact police because they felt “fear, shame, embarrassment and confusion”, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) has heard.

Brian Altman QC, counsel to the inquiry, said complainants feared they “would not be believed”, while another said social care staff were “very dismissive” when their concerns were raised.

The latest strand of the IICSA began on Monday, examining institutional responses to allegations of child sexual abuse against Lord Janner dating back half a century.

Historic sex abuse allegations
Lord Janner was accused of 22 sexual offences (Anthony Devlin/PA)

Lord Janner, a Labour MP from 1970 until 1997 when he was made a peer in the House of Lords, died in 2015 while awaiting trial for 22 counts of child sexual abuse offences, relating to nine different boys.

In an opening statement to the inquiry, Altman said Leicestershire Police conducted two investigations into the allegations against lord Janner, in 1999 and 2012, but that neither resulted in charges being brought.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

He said: “How and why no charges were brought will be the focus of much of the evidence you will hear over the next three weeks.

“His death (in December 2015) brought an end to the criminal proceedings and with it the prospect of a jury deciding whether the acts occurred.”

He added: “Every allegation made against him has been consistently and repeatedly denied.”

He told the panel: “This is not an investigation into Lord Janner’s guilt or his innocence, it is not a proxy criminal trial or a civil trial.”

Altman said one of the allegations related to a claim of buggery at a flat in Dolphin Square, in Westminster, central London, in the 1960s when the complainant was homeless having run away from care.

The alleged victim said “there was just no opportunity or person I could have told”, Altman told the inquiry.

In the 1970s, one complainant said he was indecently assaulted at a children’s home and at the Houses of Parliament, and contacted police in April 2015. The allegations were under review at the time of lord Janner’s death.

Altman said the complainant found it “too hard to even admit to myself what happened” to him.

The complainant said: “I find it too overwhelming for me to deal with – it’s like if I don’t have to tell anyone, I don’t have to admit it to myself.”

He did not report it to police at the time because he was concerned about not being believed and felt embarrassed, Altman said.

Altman told the inquiry there were “myriad reasons” why complainants did not tell police of the alleged abuse at the time.

He said this included “fear, shame, embarrassment and confusion about what the complainant said happened, or concern by the child that they would not be believed”.

Nick Stanage, representing 13 complainants on behalf of law firm Slater and Gordon, told the inquiry of the lengthy wait for “justice”.

He said: “That prosecution came many years after allegations first surfaced – it was a prosecution that came too late.

“For our clients, justice delayed was justice denied.”

He added: “Prominent people accused of child sex offences should be prosecuted with the same determination and the same vigour as any defendant.”

In a statement, lord Janner’s son Daniel Janner QC said the inquiry would “deny my family the ability to cross-examine accusers”.

He said: “My father cannot answer back from his grave.

“He is not there to defend himself.”

Previously, the investigation into MPs, peers and civil servants working at Westminster found political institutions “significantly failed in their responses to allegations of child sexual abuse”.

But it said there was no evidence of a “Westminster paedophile ring” – allegations made in the House of Commons in 2012 which kick-started the multimillion-pound inquiry, and later resulted in the prosecution of fantasist Carl Beech.

The remaining three avenues of the inquiry – including the lord Janner strand – are due to hear evidence this year, before a final report of overarching findings from all 15 sections of the investigation is laid before parliament in 2022.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. When I was a kid, around fifty years ago, many of my mates were ‘in the system’ one way or another – social workers, borstal, care homes, etc., and I had a few brushes with ‘the system’ myself. Very few spoke directly of sexual abuse, probably because of the ‘shame’ surrounding the topic, but we all knew about ‘kiddy fiddlers’ , and we all knew it would be futile to try making official complaints if it ever happened to us. We were mere kids, and bad kids at that, or we wouldn’t be ‘in the system’. Those responsible were ‘professionals’ (I still loathe that term), meaning their word was obviously to be trusted; they were above suspicion. Reporting anything untoward was proof we still hadn’t been cured, rehabilitated, or whatever the fad was at the time, so nobody ever tried.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.