Warning over rising air pollution when coronavirus restrictions end

Support us and go ad-free

Air pollution could rise significantly as coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions end, a think tank warned as it called on cities to reboot stalled plans to tackle the problem.

The fall

Levels of toxic air fell dramatically in many places in the spring as the country went into full lockdown, Centre for Cities said. But analysis shows that concentrations of air pollution have risen again over the summer to pre-pandemic levels or higher, even though most of the country remains under restrictions.

This means that, as life returns to normal, pollution could climb even higher, the think tank warned.

Impact of lockdown on nitrogen dioxide levels
(PA Graphics)

It’s calling for councils which shelved their pollution reduction plans in the face of the pandemic to revisit them. Pollution, such as nitrogen dioxide from traffic, is linked to 40,000 deaths a year in the UK, and research has suggested that 15% of coronavirus deaths can be attributed to toxic air.

Concentrations of nitrogen dioxide fell on average by 38% in cities and large towns as a result of lockdown, analysis from Centre for Cities in partnership with the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (Crea) said.

Read on...

Some of the biggest falls were seen in Glasgow, with a 57% reduction, followed by Warrington and Oxford, where pollution levels also more than halved. Other places such as Southampton saw much smaller drops. At the same time, nitrogen dioxide emissions have bounced back in most cities as the first national lockdown eased and cars and traffic returned to the roads.

In four-fifths of cities and larger towns pollution levels were back to at least pre-lockdown levels by September, despite economic activity not having fully recovered by then, according to the analysis based on official data.

In some places, such as Barnsley, Bournemouth, and Portsmouth, nitrogen dioxide levels by September were already even higher than they were before the spring lockdown.

Clean air

Centre for Cities said a number of councils were scheduled to launch clean air zones, which charge vehicles with higher levels of emissions to drive through certain areas to combat pollution. However, many plans have been delayed or even scrapped amid claims they were not immediately necessary because air quality had swiftly improved in 2020, the report said.

Centre for Cities argues that is not the case, with pollution rising as private cars have returned to the roads while public transport use remains low. It also said an increase in working from home will not curb pollution. It warned that in places such as London commuting is not the biggest cause of pollution and remote workers are more likely to use their cars for leisure.

“Political will”

The organisation is calling for councils and mayors to discourage car use by introducing clean air zones, improve buses, rail and tram systems to encourage use of public transport, and put in measures to boost cycling and walking.

Centre for Cities’ chief executive Andrew Carter said:

Toxic air has contributed to the deaths of thousands of Covid-19 victims this year and, even after the pandemic ends, will remain a big threat to health – particularly for those living in urban areas.

City leaders can reduce threat of air pollution, but it will take political will.

Discouraging car usage will be unpopular in the short term but, if coupled with the necessary improvements to public transport, the long-term benefits to public health and the economy will be huge and our cities will become better places to live.

Now is not the time for politicians to delay on this.

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us