A man murders a woman every three days in the UK. It’s time the state is held accountable

Man threatening woman

International Human Rights Day is also the final day of “16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence“. The 16 Days campaign has been taking place for the last 29 years. But despite its decades-long existence, it seems to have made no dent in femicide statistics around the world. Women are still being murdered by men at a terrifying rate.

In the UK, a man kills a woman every three days

In the UK, on 8 December, 30-year-old Shane Mays was found guilty of murdering 16-year-old Louise Smith. He was married to her aunt. Mays severely beat Smith and burned her body.

Smith is just one of thousands of women who have been murdered by men in the UK. The recently published Femicide Census names all of the 1,425 women murdered by men in the UK over a decade, between 2009 and 2018. The list is harrowing: it spans pages.

The researchers say:

Ten years ago, men in the UK were killing a woman every three days, and a woman was killed by a man who was or had been an intimate partner every four days. Today, we see the same. The Femicide Census shows us that the numbers of women killed per year, the methods used, the contexts in which women are killed and their relationship with the men who kill them have changed little over the ten-year period.

62% of the victims were murdered by men who were currently or had previously been in an intimate relationship with them. In 92% of the cases, the women knew their killer.

The findings found that many of the women had lived for years in abusive relationships, subjected to coercive control. In fact, the researchers argue that coercive control in a relationship is key to understanding whether a woman is in danger of being murdered. Physical violence is not necessarily the best indicator.

Read on...

Significant failings by the state

The Census researchers argue that:

Femicides are the epitome of the state failing to respect, protect and fulfil women’s human rights

In a number of the murder cases, investigations into police conduct found systemic failings by police forces.  On top of this, the Census has found that:

The failure to investigate and appropriately charge cases and to record the contributory factors leading up the death or killing of a woman is enabling impunity for perpetrators and breaching the right to safety and justice for women and their loved ones.

Women are most likely to be murdered in their own homes, showing that a home is most definitely not a safe haven. The Census found that men who murdered women in situations of domestic violence “receive lower sentences than other homicides”.

Under UK law, a perpetrator receives a minimum sentence of 15 years for murder if the weapon he used was already in the home where he committed the crime. But if the perpetrator takes a weapon to different location and kills someone, he is sentenced for a minimum of 25 years. It’s a travesty that the murder of someone in a home can be seen as a less serious murder than one on the street. And because most women are killed in their homes, this law can be seen as systemically sexist.

Carole Gould, whose daughter Ellie was murdered in her home by her ex-boyfriend in 2019, told the BBC:

the government is simply not interested in changing sentencing so the punishment fits the crime.

Despite providing a whole decade of data, The Census researchers argue that the state just isn’t listening. They say:

It is both heart-breaking and, frankly, makes us so angry because we, and all those who work on responses to men’s violence against women, seem to be shouting our findings, our understanding, our advocacy, into a void.

We need radical change

Although it’s a step forwards, it’s not enough to ask the government for reforms of the law, or to increase prison sentences for perpetrators. We live in a society that sexualises women for the gratification of men, and we have a mainstream media that uses “racist and sexist, sensationalist language” when reporting on femicides. And far too often, the media uses language that amounts to victim-blaming women.

The Census researchers ask:

Should we celebrate the fact that the numbers have not worsened [in the last decade], given the increased access to ever more violent pornography through the internet, the apparent increase in men’s predilection for rough sex, the cuts to specialist support services, and falling conviction rates for sexual violence? Have medical interventions masked an increase in potentially lethal violence? Or, as we suspect, is the constant level of men’s fatal violence against women and girls one of the great public policy failures of the last decade?

It’s also not enough to call for more women in power, who can call for better legislation. This won’t fix the all-pervasive sexism and misogyny in society. Sophie, a woman who works with domestic abuse survivors, spoke to The Canary. She argues that:

There’s a reason why men harass, assault, rape and kill women. Patriarchy tells men that they should be dominant and in control, especially of women, and that women are inferior to them and exist to meet their needs. Patriarchy also tells men to deal with difficult feelings using anger and violence instead of being vulnerable.

The only way to stop male violence against women is to work with young people to challenge patriarchal values before they become too ingrained, and for there to be real consequences for men’s actions.

Sophie volunteers with TIGER, a Bristol-based cooperative, delivering workshops to young people. The workshops support youths to challenge gender norms and stereotypes, to explore where these stereotypes come from, and how they affect people of all genders. In the UK, it’s currently grassroots-level organising like this that will have more success in fighting patriarchy than relying on our government.

And around the world, there are examples of women-led communities and societies challenging patriarchy head-on. Perhaps the best example of this is the feminist revolution in Rojava, northern Syria. We need to take inspiration from the women of Rojava and put anti-patriarchy at the centre of our own struggles here in the UK, and fight for gender liberation.

Featured image via Envato Elements

Get involved

  • Support TIGER by donating money or asking them to give a workshop.
  • Paladin provides advocacy services for women and girls who are at risk of serious harm or femicide from a stalker. You can donate here or contact them here.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. UKania is run by a small clique of capitalist psycho/sociopaths who love & care for money more than people…..don’t hold your breathe for change. If it were a public outcry for change at any election then the ETON NAPPY might change his views but forget Blue Labour. We’re screwed.

    2. I believe now that there is in all authority bodies an almost _dis_passionate _application_ of attitudes that mimic prejudice for the structured and conscious purpose of getting different groups, real and imagined, onside. So for example the police are authorised to carry out racist practices of harrassment of black people to get a class of white people onside; ‘investigation’ of assaults against women are botched and hampered by practices structured to get a class of men onside, and the law cited regarding murder and murder in a domestic setting shows the legal authorities too have structured law to underpin that. what we see of systemic ‘corruption’, which is a webbing existing between the institutions and not merely within each, shows that this is a matured, self-maintaining culture.

      It doesn’t seem credible to me anymore that there is actual deep racism and misogyny that is felt and believed by the forces in the shadows when a female prime minister or a female head of police make no difference and profess no different perception, and when a kind of intelligence, after a fashion, is at work in the shadows.

      It is quite like a variant of what the far right does when its figures apply a disappassionate simulation of animal welfare concerns in their campaigning, or when they suddenly have a perverse concern for women in what they say about Muslims and Islam. Strategy and calculation rather than something sincere. I would think little needs to be said in the shadows to originate and maintain this strategy as there is a residual childlike impulse in everyone that wants what correlates to safety, an impulse that can be manipulated wordlessly from moment to moment so that the practices and culture that correlate to racism and misogyny eddy and flow around this. I’ve known several formerly ‘alternative’ people who are now folded in on themselves and misogynistic, Islamophobic and anti-migrant in their 40s, 50s and 60s, assimilated by discourses that are found to soothe the person they’ve become but with no sound basis. Power can’t be challenged and struggle can’t be autonomous and optimal without individuals recognising this child that is being swayed but that is also contributing to the swaying.

      I suppose what I’m talking about is overall a strange dovetailing of absurdism and the psychoanalaytic; but the absurdity of the impulses should be something that can be seen and known that show that the oppressed groups of each of the discourses on struggle are united already.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.