Priti Patel calls taking the knee ‘gesture politics’

Support us and go ad-free

Priti Patel has said she does not support England’s footballers taking the knee in protest against racial injustice, labelling the act “gesture politics”.

The home secretary did not condemn football fans who had booed players for taking the knee, calling it a “choice for them” after Gareth Southgate’s side faced jeers from a minority of fans at their first match of Euro 2020.

Her comments come after a Number 10 spokesperson said the prime minister wants the public to “cheer them on, not boo” at the tournament, and explicitly supported those who decide to take part in the protest.

Home Secretary Priti Patel
Home Secretary Priti Patel (Aaron Chown/PA)

“Gesture Politics”

But Patel took a different stance to Boris Johnson, telling GB News:

I just don’t support people participating in that type of gesture, gesture politics, to a certain extent, as well.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

She claimed the Black Lives Matter protests last summer had a “devastating” impact on policing. And she criticised the toppling of the statue of 17th century slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol. She told broadcaster GB News:

It’s all well to support a cause and make your voices heard. But actually, quite frankly, and we saw last year in particular with some of the protests that took place, I speak now very much from what I saw in the impact on policing.

It was devastating. Not only that, I just don’t subscribe to this view that we should be rewriting our history, pulling down statues, the famous Colston statue, and what’s happened there.

Toppling statues is not the answer. It’s about learning from our past, learning from our history and actually working together to drive the right outcomes.

Asked whether England fans were right to boo the national team, she said:

That’s a choice for them, quite frankly.

And when pressed on whether she would boo the team for taking the knee, she added:

I’ve not gone to a football match to even contemplate that.

Booting out racism in football

The symbol of anti-racism solidarity gained attention in American football in 2016 as players protested against police brutality and racism in the US.

The act has since spread further and was adopted by football players in the UK partly to demonstrate that racism should not be tolerated in the sport.

But there have been incidents of a minority in the crowd booing players as they take the knee before games, including before England’s friendly matches against Austria and Romania last week.

A minority of England fans once again defied calls not to jeer the players as they took the knee before kick-off in the Euro 2020 clash with Croatia on Sunday.

Requests not to boo fell on some deaf ears, with an audible round of jeers from some of the expected 22,500 crowd at Wembley. Cheers from the vast majority soon drowned them out, though.

Labour leader Keir Starmer said taking the knee before football games is “a choice for each team”. He refused to condemn Scotland for deciding not to perform the gesture, except for when they play against England.

But he added: “I profoundly don’t think you should boo your own team before kick-off.”

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. What is the point of this article? An individual in political office supports the right to protest against multi millionaires who are making their own protest. Unless The Canary is implying one kind of protest is legitimate and the other isn’t.
      I guess this serves as a reminder as to why the left have lost the working classes.

    2. Hitler kept a couple of Jewish SS officers around to show off to foreign diplomats from neutral countries, and say “You don’t want to believe all those stories about anti-semitism, look, I even have jewish officers in my personal guard!”, introducing them as “Oberstrumbannfurer Goldstein and Standartenfuhrer Cohen”; “ugly” Patel (the REAL “Indian Variant”!) is proof that Johnson has learned the same trick! She is the “Self-Hater” personified! next time she goes to the ashram (IF she still goes, and hasn’t coverted to the white supremacist’s religion of choice, the worship of Big Cheif Walks-On-Water!) she should be refused entry and directed to the nearest “Church” and told to go and join her racist mates!

    3. 1. If the England players have the right to express views through “taking the knee”, than those that disagree with them have a right to express their views by booing. Once you ban opinions that are different from your own we are going down a very dangerous road.
      2. What would happen to an England player who did not take the knee? would he be dropped from the team?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.