Ministers accused of ‘covering up’ underfunding of early years education
A new report by an early years organisation says ministers knew they were underfunding the sector, passing on the costs to parents and driving down quality.
Early Years Alliance (EYA) conducted a two year FOI investigation. The alliance found that the Department for Education (DfE) only gave local authorities two-thirds of the money needed to fully fund early years places for three and four year olds.
Research has previously found that missing out on good quality early years education disproportionately affects disadvantaged children.
Lowered quality
The data EYA obtained from the DfE shows that in 2015 civil servants estimated that funding early years places for three and four-year-olds would cost the government on average £7.49 an hour by 2020/21.
However, an independent analysis by Ceeda concluded that local authorities received an average of £4.89 per hour to fund the scheme.
EYA says that this underfunding leads to lowered quality as early years providers have to provide lower staff to children ratios. According to the alliance, the Early Years Spending Review Scenarios document reads:
We will strip out funding for consumables (food, nappies) – and set an expectation that providers charge parents for these.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free
This meant that parents end up paying higher costs for early years childcare.
‘Fair and adequate funding’
Neil Leitch, chief executive of EYA, said:
For years, the early years sector has warned that the so-called ‘free entitlement’ offer is anything but free, in the face of repeated government claims that the policy is adequately funded. These documents, which they spent more than two years trying to hide, prove otherwise.
The early years of a child’s life are critical to their long-term learning and development – and yet ministers have been all too happy to force providers to work to maximum ratios, inevitably reducing quality, in order to save the Treasury some money.
Leitch called for a full review of UK policy concerning the early years sector, and for ‘needed’ investment. He added:
Only with fair and adequate funding will we ensure nurseries, pre-schools and childminders can continue delivering the quality, affordable care and education that children and families both need and deserve.
A spokesperson for the DfE said:
We’ve made an unprecedented investment in childcare over the past decade, spending more than £3.5 billion in each of the past three years on our free childcare offers and increasing the hourly rate paid to councils above inflation for the past two years.
Through our early years funding formula, which we introduced after consultation with the sector, councils must pass on the vast majority of the funding they receive for the three and four-year-old entitlements. The number of childcare places available for parents in England has remained broadly stable since 2015, and we are not aware of any significant issues for parents in accessing free places – we work closely with councils to ensure this remains the case.
The DfE added that EYA’s figures predate them increasing payment rates for early years settings. Additional investment was announced by the chancellor in both 2019 and 2020.
Calls for change
The report follows a petition calling for an independent review into childcare affordability and funding. The petition has received over 100,000 signatures, and is waiting on a date for debate in parliament.
According to Early Education, more than a third of maintained nursery schools are cutting services and staff after losing income from coronavirus (Covid-19) and lack of funding certainty. Maintained nursery schools are controlled and funded by local authorities, but specialise in 3-5 year olds. They are led by headteachers.
Maintained nursery schools reported losing an average of over £70,000 income, as well as spending £8,000 more for costs related to coronavirus.
Labour has condemned the government for the knowing underfunding of early years providers. Tulip Siddiq, shadow minister for children and early years, said:
The Tories owe parents an apology for this betrayal and for covering it up.
Featured image via YouTube/E Patonwas
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
The case for significant investment in early years education – and, by ‘early years’ I mean from birth – is well known and has a greater effect of subsequent achievement than investment in any other stage of education. To be fair to Blair and Brown, this was something in which they invested substantial funding, but failed to make the argument forcibly and also undercut it by adopting the baleful “Woodhead” inspection regime.
As far as the Tories are concerned, they know the benefits of early years investment, but wilfully choose NOT to do so, because the current formula for funding favours the later stages of secondary education and this stage has a disproportionate representation of the more affluent social classes. Less affluent groups tend to leave school education in greater numbers at the earliest possible opportunity.
By the introduction of ‘academies’ and the associated selection, despite trying to sanitise the term, greater amounts of funding go to schools with a more affluent intake.
The ‘academies’ are also a legacy of the Blair/Brown years, with their mendacious ‘triangulation’.