Class action launched against government over Northern Ireland Protocol

Containers at a dock
Support us and go ad-free

A class action has been launched against the government claiming post-Brexit Irish Sea trading arrangements infringe the economic rights of people living in the north of Ireland. The Northern Ireland Protocol’s terms have adversely affected some companies. If successful, the commercial litigation could pave the way for these companies to claim significant financial damages from the government.

Brexit means legal action

The legal move is different to separate legal challenges that have been mounted against the Protocol on constitutional grounds.

The action names the Cabinet Office and attorney general as defendants. And it seeks a declaration from the High Court in London that provisions relating to the Protocol in the EU Withdrawal Act conflict with the economic rights provided for in the UK Human Rights Act. The 1998 Human Rights Act enshrines the European Convention on Human Rights in domestic legislation.

The claim form was lodged with the High Court this week. It names Ballymena haulage company Blair International and DUP North Antrim MP Ian Paisley as the initial claimants.

Solicitor Clive Thorne is acting for the claimants. He said the next legal stage move would be to formally add a “long queue” of interested companies to the action. A court hearing would then follow. He told the PA news agency:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

We’re in touch with a whole series of other claimants who it is envisaged will join the action

The EU and UK agreed the Northern Ireland Protocol during the withdrawal negotiations. This was in an effort to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland. The protocol achieves that by moving many regulatory and customs processes to the Irish Sea, with goods arriving into the region from GB post-Brexit subjected to significant new red tape.

The arrangements have caused some disruption to trade since the start of 2021 as firms have struggled with the extra bureaucracy.

Brexit
New checks required under the Northern Ireland Protocol have led to heightened tensions in the north of Ireland (Liam McBurney/PA)

Human rights conflict

However, unionists and loyalists vehemently oppose the arrangements. And they’re claiming they undermine the north of Ireland’s place in the UK internal market.

Thorne said the claim argues that the Protocol discriminates against businesses involved in GB/NI trade. Because it hinders their ability to operate as effectively as UK traders not involved in Irish Sea shipping. Thorne said those economically harmed included businesses in the north but also GB traders who did business in the region.

He said the second aspect of the action centred on the contention that there was no democratic mandate for the Protocol within the north of Ireland. And he added:

We would say that the Protocol legislation is unlawful because it conflicts with the rights under the Human Rights Act and contained in the European Convention

The solicitor added:

This very much is a piece of commercial litigation, rather than political or constitutional litigation, whereby businesses in Northern Ireland, and also in Great Britain, have suffered adversity as a result of the framing of the Protocol and the way in which it has become part of United Kingdom law.

Compensation

Thorne said compensation claims would likely follow if the High Court declared the Protocol unlawful. He said:

If the Government is found to have acted unlawfully, then it has opened the door to possible subsequent claims for compensation for the damage suffered

A separate legal challenge has been launched against the Protocol on constitutional grounds. This challenge claims the Protocol undermines the Act of Union and the terms of the region’s historic Good Friday agreement. It involves former Brexit MEP Ben Habib and baroness Kate Hoey. And leaders of the three main unionist parties in the north of Ireland also support it.

Paisley said the new legal challenge complemented the constitutional judicial review.

He added:

It’s very much looking at the commercial damage that’s being done to various commercial interests and the various sectors within the economy and it has to attack the Protocol from that point of view, so that’s why it’s different but it’s very complementary.

I think it is important that as many people come together and demonstrate to the Government that this has to be challenged constitutionally, politically, societally and economically.

Paisley said using his name as a claimant was a “technical” move. He said his main role was to provide a pathway to encourage and facilitate companies to join the challenge. He said:

Potentially I think this will end up being a multimillion-pound legal claim on behalf of several companies for loss against the Government

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Do you want to know what the true game plan was? Cummings has revealed it: https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=211524674233726&ref=watch_permalink

      TL;DW, the aim is to destroy the Irish economy, forcing the EU to put the customs union between the EU & IRELAND, effectively incorporating the Irish economy into the UK ‘sphere of interest’.

      This is the plan. This is the direction.

      Everything make more sense now? All the botches, non-planning, misdirections, and lies Lies LIES LIES LIES!!! No, I won’t leave the chamber, go F yourself.

      Ireland is already an offshored low tax-haven, which is also the direction BloJo and his bunch of thieving scum intend.

      ALL wealth heading up the economy, and the majority slaving for peanuts just to stay alive in unheated and unpowered slums. Without healthcare, or even education. Just like the Tories always wanted, and all enabled by the ‘Get Brexshit Done!’ morons.

      And Ireland a ‘colony’ yet again.

      I doubt even ‘Catholic’ Biden is going to do jack shit to stop this.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.