US congress members urge Boris Johnson to rethink ban on Troubles prosecutions

US House of Congress
Support us and go ad-free

Members of US congress have called on Boris Johnson to scrap his proposals to ban future prosecutions related to the Troubles in the north of Ireland.

Special relationship

In a letter to the prime minister, the US congress members also called for the British government to reaffirm its commitment to the Stormont House Agreement. In the letter, the members expressed concern that the proposed legacy laws would strain the British-Irish relationship and “cement widespread feelings” that justice is being denied.

In July, Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis announced plans for a statute of limitations which would end all prosecutions for Troubles incidents up to April 1998. And it would apply to military veterans as well as ex-paramilitaries.

Northern Ireland Troubles
Raymond McCord speaking outside Belfast City Hall (Liam McBurney/PA)

Johnson previously said the proposals would allow the north of Ireland to “draw a line under the Troubles”. They would also end all legacy inquests and civil actions related to the conflict.

The move has been widely condemned by campaigners on both sides of the Troubles and across the political divide.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
“Serious mistake”

The letter, led by congressmen Brendan Boyle and Brian Fitzpatrick, has been signed by 36 members. They said it would be a “serious mistake” for the British government to renege on its commitments laid out under the Stormont House Agreement. And the added that it would lead to “major setbacks” in the search for justice and reconciliation.

Moreover, they said they were “disappointed” that the UK government plans to introduce new legislation that would modify the Agreement’s legacy laws. They added:

To be clear, we strongly disapprove these proposals

We believe that they would not only prevent a pathway to justice, but that they would also strip these families of their legal rights protected under European Law and the Good Friday Agreement.

The issue of legacy killings spans across generations and any continued deprival of justice will only further deepen the wound that this history has on Britain and Ireland. We are concerned that these legacy laws would strain the British-Irish relationship and cement widespread feelings that justice is being denied.

There is no doubt that the difficult and troubling legacy of the past must be addressed, and we as members of congress will continue to advocate on this issue until good faith action is taken and progress is made.

These legacy proposals require genuine reconsideration. Delivering answers for these bereaved families has been a longstanding priority for Irish-American community and those interested in global peace. We will continue to listen to these families as they await long overdue answers.

We urge you to re-examine these proposals, reverse the decision and reaffirm your commitment to the Stormont House Agreement.

They also expressed concern that the Historical Investigations Unit, set up under the 2014 Agreement, has been slow to investigate legacy cases. Describing the unit as “stagnant”, they added:

Had the Historical Investigations Unit been provided with the resources and attention it was promised more substantial progress might have been achieved over the past several years

Northern Ireland Troubles
Eugene Reavey, Cathy McIlvenny, Julie Hambleton, Raymond McCord, Michael Gallagher, and Billy McManus during a meeting at the HELP (Helping Everybody Live Peacefully) office in north Belfast (Liam McBurney/PA)

Limitations

Part of the push for a statute of limitations is a bid to prevent British Army veterans who served during the Troubles from being held accountable for alleged criminality decades later.

Raymond McCord, whose son Raymond Jr was murdered by loyalist paramilitaries, said:

The only people who agree with these proposals are the people who are trying to push it through.

Why is Boris and (Northern Ireland Secretary) Brandon Lewis so eager to get this through? If people are innocent, would why they need an amnesty? The only people who need amnesty are people who are guilty. The letter is a massive step forward because we have the support of the biggest democracy in the world, powerful people in congress.

Boris is being told that he is breaking the Good Friday Agreement. This is a massive boost, not just for my family, but for all victims.

I really welcome this letter. We have politicians from the main land on board, we’ve got politicians from Dublin and Northern Ireland on board, and now we have America on board. Every single one of them rejects the proposals. It will put a lot of pressure on Boris Johnson.

What Prime Minister would want to give an amnesty to murderers?

Johnson’s office has been contacted for comment.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. American Congress men and women would be better using their time in office focused on Americans ‘troubles’, such as voting rights, individuals rights, police corruption and brutality as well as the shortage of low income housing and welfare.

      When the US Congress is doing it’s own job well it can spend some time poking into other countries business. Yes, Bogus Johnson is as big an imbecile as Trumpashenko, but he’s Britain’s problem, not yours. Eff off!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.