As the UK suffers multiple crises, Keir Starmer is busy trying to make Labour less democratic

Keir Starmer looking backwards
Support us and go ad-free

Keir Starmer’s bid to reform Labour’s leadership election rules appeared “dead” on Saturday 25 September. His deputy confirmed Starmer’s electoral college proposal will not be put to the party’s autumn conference.

The proposal had divided the party and sparked talk of a “civil war” with the left in the build-up to its Brighton conference. In it, the Labour leader was understood to be pushing to scrap the system  which was used to elect both him and Jeremy Corbyn as leader.

Watered down reforms

Trade unions failed to back the move during crunch talks this week. So now the opposition leader seems to have heavily watered down his reforms. They’re due to be discussed by the party’s ruling body, the National Executive Committee (NEC), on Saturday 25 September.

Deputy leader Angela Rayner said it was her understanding that the electoral college idea wouldn’t be discussed at the NEC meeting. So delegates would not vote on it at the party conference this weekend.

Asked on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme whether Starmer’s proposals were likely to be voted on at conference, Rayner added: “Some will, some won’t because that’s the natural rhythm of how conference works”.

Pressed on whether the reforms for how a future leader is elected will be voted on, she replied:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

My understanding is that the electoral college is not coming to the NEC, so therefore that wouldn’t.

Under the original proposal, the one member, one vote (OMOV) system would have been replaced with a return to the electoral college. This would be made up of unions and affiliate organisations, MPs and party members.

Starmer was understood to favour the three parts of the electoral college having an equal share of the vote. This would have meant that votes from Labour’s 400,000 members would have the same weighting as the party’s 199 MPs.

Instead, the PA news agency said those plans have been diluted. Although party sources insisted there would still be “significant changes” put forward.

“Vote against”

A Labour spokesperson said:

Keir said on Tuesday it wasn’t a take it or leave it deal.

That’s how we’ve approached it and we’re pleased with where we’ve ended up.

PA news agency understands the leadership rule changes to be discussed by the NEC will include raising the amount of Labour MP support a candidate requires to get onto the leadership ballot from 10% to 25%, and abandoning registered supporter involvement. The suggested changes have received criticism:

Under the proposals, members will also need to have been signed up for six months to be allowed to vote in a future leadership contest.

“Keir Starmer’s attack on democracy”

Starmer also wants to make it more difficult to deselect MPs. He wants to raise the threshold for triggering a selection contest, with 50% of local branches in the Constituency Labour Party (CLP) and affiliated union and socialist groups needing to back such a move.

Under the current rules, an MP selection race can be ignited if only one third of CLP branches or affiliated groups is in favour.

In a statement, left-wing campaign group Momentum vowed to fight against the fresh proposals.

Mish Rahman, a member of Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) and Momentum’s national co-ordinating group, said:

The central measure of Keir Starmer’s attack on democracy has comprehensively failed. The electoral college is dead.

Now to make sure all the other regressive rule changes concocted by the leadership share the same fate.

From trigger ballot changes to increases in the MP nomination threshold ahead, they all need to go in the bin.

The reforms are unlikely to be the only controversial issue debated by delegates.

Other conference flashpoints for the leader could include rows over Labour’s position on trans rights, commitments on tackling climate change and changes mandated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission after its investigation into antisemitism.

Reaction

Others have reacted to Starmer’s u-turn online:

 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The endorsement of Evans, though with significant opposition is dismal. His admission that he jettisoned members’ rights in defence of what he calls “responsibilities” is pure Stalinism: the Party decides what is responsible and denies rights which may challenge it. At the core of this is something very simple but which the Left doesn’t say often enough: great wealth is the enemy of democracy because it buys influence. There is a large body of research into the question. A cursory look at it reveals corporate power overwhelms votes. Democracy and inequality are oil and water. That’s why there is such an assault on democracy in Labour under Starmer. Labour is committed to making the world safe for billionaires. Its leaders want to join them. They may not become billionaires but if they’re lucky they will be multi-millionaires. Some already are. Rayner wants to be. A £10 living wage and rights from the first day at work are crumbs, they are pitiful bribes to people Labour holds in contempt. Its eyes ae fixed on the rich and powerful. They are Starmer’s friends. There is not a shred of radicalism in Labour. Read the 14,000 words of sub-A level drivel Starmer has just produced. Here’s the precis: the purpose of the State is to defend property. Labour will ensure it does that. The rich will be looked after first. The rest will get the scraps. The people on the floor of the conference want change, those on the platform want power and money. The purge of democratic socialists will go on. But there is a new movement to be born which in due course could be a new party. Labour’s radicalism, such as it was is dead.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.