No 10 and Met Police accused of a ‘stitch up’ over last minute partygate intervention

Boris Johnson wearing a mask


Support us and go ad-free

Scotland Yard’s intervention to urge Sue Gray to limit the publication of her investigation into allegations of lockdown-breaking parties in Number 10 has faced widespread criticism and fury. It’s also sparked accusations of corruption at the highest levels:

The Met scratching the PM’s back?

The Metropolitan Police asked the senior civil servant to only make “minimal reference” to the events that are now subject to a criminal investigation, throwing her report into disarray and potentially buying more time for Boris Johnson as he faces a threat to his leadership. The force argued the constraints on the Cabinet Office report are necessary to “avoid any prejudice to our investigation”, meaning it faces being watered down or a lengthy delay.

Related articles

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Ken Macdonald, the former director of public prosecutions (DPP), said the move seems “disproportionate” in the face of “very powerful” public interest in the report’s swift publication, unless there is “more serious conduct” being investigated. Others have also questioned the situation:

Veteran Tory MP Roger Gale, one of the Conservatives to call for Johnson’s resignation, described it as a “farce” which could buy more time for the “lame duck” prime minister. Gale described the police intervention as “ridiculous”, saying:

Unless there is a legal barrier to Sue Gray publishing her report then I believe that it should be published now and in full.

The Tory argued the soaring cost of living and Russian aggression towards Ukraine require Johnson’s “full and undivided attention”, but instead he is “a lame duck Prime Minister that is soldiering on”.

Opposition politicians warned of a “stitch-up” amid growing calls for the official report into potential coronavirus (Covid-19) breaches in Downing Street and wider government to be published in full, with it having the potential to trigger a vote of no confidence in Johnson.

In a statement on the morning of Friday 28 January, Scotland Yard said:

For the events the Met is investigating, we asked for minimal reference to be made in the Cabinet Office report.

The Met did not ask for any limitations on other events in the report, or for the report to be delayed, but we have had ongoing contact with the Cabinet Office, including on the content of the report, to avoid any prejudice to our investigation.

The statement indicates Gray will either have to make significant changes to her report before publication or delay it until after the police inquiry concludes.

 

Cressida Dick
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick’s officers have opened a criminal probe (Victoria Jones/PA)

Cressida Dick

In 2021, Dick denied the Metropolitan Police Force was “institutionally corrupt” following an eight-year probe that found the force to be institutionally corrupt. Johnson has also been accused of “corruption”, and in 2021 backed Dick to remain in her position despite considerable backlash. Labour leader Keir Starmer has also come out in support of Dick:

At the point when Johnson defended her continued position, Starmer said:

Cressida Dick is fit to continue

This was after the probe found the Met to be institutionally corrupt under Dick (and before her). Starmer added:

I’ve worked with Cressida over many years in relation to some very serious operations when I was director of public prosecutions. I was pleased that her contract was extended and I support her.

“A bit of a mystery”

Lord Macdonald said there is a “very powerful public interest in the speedy publication” of the Gray report, arguing that although it could “tip off” potential suspects or witnesses, they are likely to be issued with fixed penalty notices not requiring a trial. He told BBC Radio 4’s the World at One programme:

I very much doubt that anything that Sue Gray says is going to come as any great surprise to any of the protagonists so it’s all a bit of a mystery

He conceded that if she found, for example, the “co-ordinated deletion of emails or text messages, this could raise the stakes” requiring the police to have more space. He concluded:

But absent of that sort of factor – and that’s pure speculation – this does seem to be a very cautious, perhaps overly cautious, move by the Met in the face of a very powerful countervailing public interest for publication.

Unless there is some other more serious conduct in play here that we’re not aware of, I do think the police approach this morning has been surprising and in many ways quite unhelpful.

The risk of the police intervention this morning is that this leaves things hanging in the air for weeks and months and that seems obviously not to be in the public interest.

Sources close to the inquiry have previously indicated Gray was concerned about the prospect of releasing a report that was shorn of some of its key findings, raising the likelihood of a significant delay. Officers have not confirmed how many events they are investigating, but reports have suggested it could be as high as eight.

“A circus”

Government minister Chris Philp said “between Sue Gray’s report and the police investigation, everything will be fully covered”, insisting to broadcasters that “the Government aren’t interfering with it”.

Labour leader Starmer, another former DPP, called for the full report to be published “as soon as possible” but failed to criticise the Met, saying “any issues of prejudice have got to be worked through”.

Fran Hall, whose husband served in the police for more than three decades before dying with coronavirus, accused the Met of letting bereaved families down as the Gray inquiry becomes “a circus”.

Sue Gray
Sue Gray’s report remains awaited (Gov.uk/PA)

“Painful”

The spokesperson for the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice said:

It’s incredibly painful and they have let families like mine down. My husband was completely committed to justice, and he would have been appalled by this.

SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford called for the report to be published “in full and undoctored without further delay”. He added:

People are understandably concerned that this increasingly looks like a cover-up.

Nazir Afzal, a former chief Crown prosecutor for the North West, said:

Downing Street said it had not had any conversations with the Met or the Cabinet office over what can be published.

So far seven Tory MPs have publicly called for Johnson to quit, but others are believed to have done so privately in letters to the chairman of the Conservatives’ 1922 Committee. If the number of letters received by Graham Brady hits 54, representing 15% of all Tory MPs, then a vote of no confidence in the prime minister’s leadership is triggered.

Johnson would have to then win the support of half of Conservative MPs in order to stay in No 10.

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments

    1. ?. What is the delay in releasing the report asks LOTO?.
      Met police step in and suggest a report is ‘altered’ in some way. ie; rewritten.
      One might ask the same of the Forde Report. Would the answer be the same?. (allegedly).
      Hypocrisyof the nth degree.

      Report comment

    2. Personally, I’m quite happy with the PM too busy to “concentrate on Russian aggression”. Esopecially as it’s actually Russian reaction to NATO aggression. Be a LOOOONG time before the current corporate media admit that.

      Sure is a shame Corbyn didn’t win, and then this ‘war’ wouldn’t be happening at all. At least, not to us.

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/04/demonisation-russia-risks-paving-way-for-war?CMP=share_btn_fb

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/05/clash-crimea-western-expansion-ukraine-fascists

      As for this report, the only commissioners I’d trust are those Priti Itself would try to replace as insufficiently fascist. Dick sent her officers to beat up a womens’ vigil for a woman murdered BY her officers. I think it’s safe to assume she is corrupt at some level. Is she in Maxwell’s diary?

      Report comment

    3. Corruption abounds.
      Two letters I sent to the Guardian (not published, of course).
      1) 13.25 28Jan
      The Met was pressed by MPs for months to investigate allegations that No 10 and associates had broken Covid rules, but refused on the dubious grounds ’they were historic and could not be investigated’ (“Key parts of Sue Gray report could be pared back due to Met investigation”, Ben Quinn and Aubrey Allegretti, 8 Jan).
      Only after the Sue Gray report was reluctantly set up, did the Met belatedly agree to investigate the alleged frolics of the greased piglet and others during covid restrictions. This long overdue Met involvement has emasculated, and delayed the Sue Gray report, regardless of the Met’s pious hopes otherwise. The Met has stated “we have had ongoing contact with the Cabinet Office, including on the content of the report, to avoid any prejudice to our investigation”. I’ll bet they have. Back to your day job, Sue.
      2) 13.25 28 Jan
      The Met’s statement “…. we have had ongoing contact with the Cabinet Office, including on the content of the report, to avoid any prejudice to our investigation.”(Met asked for ‘minimal reference’ to No 10 investigation in Sue Gray report, PA Media, 28 Jan). This ‘minimal reference’ indicates that the Gray report could amount to little more than one side of A4, causing little grief for our PM.
      As time goes on the decision to accede to an in-house investigation into the No 10’s jollifications undertaken by a civil servant is proving just the ticket for Johnson. The Met statement reveals the room for the omission of content regarded as too unhelpful to the PM’s first aim of self-preservation. As for the Met’s investigation, who knows when that will be completed: after the next GE?

      Report comment

    5. Cruella Bell-End has just provided evidence that the Police are not to be trusted. They are used by the establishment to promulgate their wishes without public recourse. It’s time the sTories were ousted from Whitehall, along with their accomplice Starmer.

      Jeremy, Jeremy, Jeremy. Wherefore art thou Jeremy. Britain needs you more than ever.

      Report comment

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.

Related articles