Veteran journalist says US and UK treatment of Chelsea Manning signals a ‘return of fascism’

A photo of Chelsea Manning and John Pilger.
Support us and go ad-free

The US government is now fining Chelsea Manning $1,000 per day for her refusal to testify in front of a grand jury. Journalist John Pilger has described her treatment as “a warning of the return of fascism.”

Jailed for contempt

A judge had previously jailed Manning for contempt in March. She had declined to give evidence about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange in front of a grand jury. The authorities eventually freed her in May. But seven days later, Judge Anthony Trenga ordered her back to jail. This was for again declining to testify in front of the grand jury.

The judge also ordered that, after 30 days, Manning pay fines of $500 every day she remains in jail. So far, these fines amount to $15,000. But the judge had also ordered that the fines increase after 60 days. And as of 16 July, her fines are now $1,000 per day.

Her legal team believes her total fines will be over $440,000 if she continues in her refusal to give evidence. They argued that:

This excessive amount may violate her Eighth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

The return of fascism?

Also criticising Manning’s treatment was Australian journalist John Pilger. In an interview with the Morning Star, Pilger said:

Chelsea is incarcerated in Virginia and fined $1,000 a day for refusing to incriminate the Wikileaks editor of non-existent crimes.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

He went on to state that the British government jailed Assange so that it can eventually extradite him “to Trump’s dungeons”. Pilger also accused British foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt of “hypocrisy” for holding a conference on media freedom just seven miles from where the British government is holding Assange.

And as a result, he declared:

Mark these disgraces as a warning of the return of fascism.

Fighting for freedom

Manning’s lawyers previously filed a motion requesting her immediate release. They argued that the government cannot coerce her “and that her incarceration is therefore only punitive”. Given this, they asserted that the government is violating Manning’s due process rights.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons – Manolo Luna / Wikimedia Commons – SCU Media Students

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Excessive fines used to be classed as cruel and unusual punishment, presumably because they can crush the poor by destroying their finances. Excessive fines are now a favourite blunt instrument used more widely as western powers become more authoritarian in their drive to crush working class dissent.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.