Zuckerberg quietly hid left-wing news from you, it’s just been revealed
Facebook intentionally curbed the visibility of left-leaning news outlets from its algorithm in 2017, limiting their readership, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has reported.
According to WSJ, when Facebook engineers altered the newsfeed algorithm to reduce political news, changes had a larger impact on left-wing sites. The WSJ reported that Mark Zuckerberg personally approved the changes.
The alterations were made after executives raised concerns that right-wing sites would be affected more by plans to reduce political news.
The impact on publishers
One of the outlets thought to have been affected by the changes is progressive outlet Mother Jones. The publication is a magazine that focuses on investigative journalism.
The editor-in-chief of Mother Jones estimated that the reduction in traffic meant losses of “$400,000 to $600,000 a year” for the magazine and resulted in pay cuts.
Ben Dreyfuss, editorial director for growth and strategy at Mother Jones, said:
[Social media editors] want people to read the stories. They want to make a difference. A lot of times, it doesn’t work and that’s just life, but when it doesn’t work ever, it is very frustrating, because you feel like you’ve let down not only your audience but your colleagues. It’s difficult and disheartening to keep running into walls, and to learn that the walls were placed there intentionally, so my colleagues and I would be stopped as we tried to promote our magazine’s work, makes me livid.
Read on...
Bias claims
After Trump was elected in November 2016, Facebook was accused of playing a large part in the circulation of ‘fake news’.
Conservative outlets claimed Facebook had an anti-conservative bias in 2016 after it was alleged that workers had removed right-wing topics from the ‘trending’ section.
According to The WSJ, fears were raised that updates on political news visibility would add to accusations of anti-conservative bias. This reportedly lead to redesign that affected “left-leaning sites… more than previously planned”
In response to the allegations, A Facebook spokesperson told the WSJ:
We did not make changes with the intent of impacting individual publishers.
Facebook’s algorithm history
In 2018, Zuckerberg announced that Facebook would make changes to its algorithm to give priority to content from “friends, family and groups”. Facebook would also limit the visibility of content from media and businesses.
Some left-wing publications had already reported noticing their Facebook traffic had dropped dramatically.
In response, several left-wing UK outlets, including The Canary, joined together in March 2018 to try and maintain the availability of their publications. A joint Facebook group was created ‘to help combat technical changes imposed by Facebook’. However, with the US election currently approaching The Canary has noticed another reduction in the reach of its articles on Facebook. The secretive nature of Facebook’s and Google’s algorithm means that news sites have no control or understanding of how changes to it will affect their ability to reach readers.
To ensure you always see articles from The Canary you can sign-up for free to our daily news email here.
Featured image via Flickr/Anthony Quintano
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Consent is manufactured. Ignorance is not stupidity. Billionaires depend on the successful maintenance of both consent and ignorance of alternatives. T’internet over produces information so that finding some information is similar to trying to find Wally/Waldo. It’s there but sometimes takes time and effort to find. The trouble with t’internet is it exists almost exclusively on the ‘Bourgeois terrain’, which is anti-left and naturally right-wing.
Lanterndude is absolutely correct. I suggest this is an example for the breakup of FaceBook as another over powerful monopoly. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It’s funny, just about the only thing TheCanary and TheTramp agree on is corporate mainstream ‘fake news’, lol lol.
Shame TheTramp didn’t hire Chomsky or Media Lens to sort that out. 😉