The debate on climate change can be pretty polarised at times with the sceptics and environmentalists dominating the two main camps. So it’s probably the media’s job to maintain the balance. But Media Lens (ML), a critic of the mainstream media, argues that there is no balance in either the portrayal of the crisis or its solutions.
Let’s have a look at what it says.
How real is climate change?
The baseline consensus, of course, is that it is real. But there are still some that refuse to acknowledge this. And the extent of the climate crisis has never really been acknowledged.
ML makes the point that we are facing the Earth’s sixth mass extinction in four-and-a-half billion years of geological history. And it is the only one that humans themselves will have caused. It is also arguably accelerating, as the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved its symbolic Doomsday Clock forward thirty seconds towards apocalypse.
In addition, studies have reported ‘extraordinarily hot’ Arctic conditions that “could trigger uncontrollable climate change at global level”. Global warming could raise global sea levels to heights that may wipe out coastal cities and settlements.
And some even think we are at a point of no return.
Politicians didn’t get the memo
The international commitment is to keep global warming below 2°C, which is still dangerous enough to threaten some life on Earth. This may be too ambitious. The climate may now be so sensitive to greenhouse gasses that we could be looking at a 7°C temperature lift within a human lifespan.
At a time of manufactured fear by ‘mainstream’ media about ‘fake news’ and ‘post-truth’ politics, how divorced from reality is the government when it would rather ignore such an important report, far less address seriously the urgent truth of climate chaos?
It’s perhaps apt that it’s Donald Trump’s outrageous policy initiatives consuming the media. Thus detracting from other ludicrous things going on with his administration. The environment isn’t getting off scot-free from Trump’s rampage, for example. He has appointed oil and coal men to senior positions. Men like Rex Tillerson, former ExxonMobil chairman and CEO, and now US Secretary of State.
But that’s not to say Obama’s legacy was something to write home about. Leading climate scientist Jim Hanson said that Obama uttered the right words, but missed the boat:
When he had control of both houses of Congress and a 70 percent approval rating, he could have done something strong on climate in the first term – but he would have had to be a different personality than he is. He would have to have taken the FDR [Franklin D Roosevelt] approach of explaining things to the American public with his “fireside chats,” and he would have had to work with Congress, which he didn’t do.
But the media never told us that
But if we don’t have an actual understanding of the extent of climate change, how can we get a balanced assessment of how it’s being tackled? ML says that media outlets do OK on the science. But they don’t tackle the “serious and radical measures” needed. This includes an in-depth look at how corporations and co-opted governments muffle progress on climate change. Or what we can do about it.
The silence is deafening on the threat of climate change. National security threats dominate the media, distorting where the real priorities lie. When politics, big business, and media all interlink, we need to work extra hard to bring out the facts. And the need has never been more urgent.
– Read more Canary articles on Climate Change.
– Play your part in the ongoing media revolution by reading and supporting new media organisations that do better.
Please add more that you like in the comments.
The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, Manchester Mule, Salford Star
Featured image via Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?