The British Government has launched a new centre for fighting cyber security threats. Its website offers abundant advice, yet it neglects to advise citizens on how to protect themselves from the biggest hackers of all. Namely, GCHQ (and its US partner, the NSA). As the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) is the London arm of GCHQ, this makes perfect sense.
Launching the centre, CEO Ciaran Martin said:
Our job is to make the UK the safest place to live and do business online. We will help secure our critical services, lead the response to the most serious incidents and improve the underlying security of the Internet through technological improvement and advice to citizens and organisations.
Hackers threaten or protect?
The tips NCSC gives only go so far. They exclude advice on implementing enhanced security measures useful for avoiding surveillance by consumer organisations and the state. Moreover, they ignore Edward Snowden’s advice on personal privacy.
Turkey would be proud of this law
Ironically, the launch of the NCSC comes in the same week that the Law Commission announced that Britain should adopt draconian anti-transparency measures. It recommends journalists and their sources should be jailed for up to 14 years for revealing government incompetence.
The snooping activities of GCHQ would also be pivotal in securing the prosecution of such journalists and their sources.
Cyber security should not only be a government or business concern, however. It’s about protecting citizens from ALL threats.
– Read up on the latest from Big Brother Watch.
– You can also donate to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Featured image via Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?