The Tories were hoping no one would stumble across this list of mass NHS sell-offs before the election. But we did.
The Tory government has come under fire for backing the Naylor report. Theresa May has vowed to implement the Naylor proposals, which advise the government to sell off NHS assets in order to bring the health service in line with budget plans. It could potentially mean £5.7bn worth of NHS assets are sold off.
But the Tories may be surprised by the public’s recent uproar. Because they’ve been selling off masses of NHS land since 2013. And they’ve been hiding it in plain sight, as the list of NHS treasures they’ve been selling off to the highest bidder – all 345 of them – is in the public domain.
But it’s so extensive that, once coupled with the looming Naylor firesale, it’s hard to see how we’re going to have many NHS assets left if the Tories take power on 8 June.
The list goes on, and on…
There are 345 parts of the NHS designated as “surplus land” on the list, which is freely available to download on Google. The list, which seems to have been created in 2016, reveals that sales of this “surplus land” started in 2013 and will continue until 2020. The sell-offs did, however, reach a major peak in 2016.
In 2014, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt asked Lord Carter of Coles to prepare a report on how the NHS could “improve efficiency in hospitals in England”. The Carter report was submitted [pdf] in February 2016. It advised that hospital trusts needed to standardise their estates in order to achieve “efficient” running costs. It said [pdf] that trusts should create:
a plan to operate with a maximum of 35% of non-clinical floor space and 2.5% of unoccupied or under-used space by April 2017.
Around 100 of the “surplus land” plots were sold or advertised in 2016 following the report.
Give me the good stuff
Sometimes, the sales constituted only a small proportion of the trust’s assets. For example, a trust may have planned to sell a car park, or one of its non-essential buildings. But on other occasions, whole centres or facilities were included in the “surplus land” list. Such as, but not exclusively:
- Woodlands Nursing Home, Lambeth (advertised).
- Honeylands Children’s Centre, Exeter (advertised).
- Priory Day Centre, Barnsley (advertised).
- Garforth Clinic, Leeds (advertised).
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital HQ, Southwark (contracts exchanged).
- Essex County Hospital, Colchester (contracts exchanged).
Furthermore, the sites earmarked for sale were overwhelmingly part of Mental Health and Learning Disability Trusts. Yet in the election campaign, the Tories have taken great pains to promise support for those with mental health issues. Of the 345 sites deemed as surplus, 178 of them belonged to these service specialities.
32 sites owned by Ambulance Trusts were also pegged for sale. As were the following:
- 23 Acute teaching trust sites.
- 7 Acute specialist trust sites.
- 19 Acute small trust sites.
- 3 Acute multi-service trust sites.
- 17 Acute medium trust sites.
- 61 Acute large trust sites.
- 5 Community trust sites.
Mental Health and Learning Disability sites for sale regularly included entire clinics or facilities being lost. Ambulance stations were also more commonly up for sale in their entirety.
The list contains a high number of assets that seemingly weren’t sold by the time it was published. Because an extensive amount do not have any figures attached for sale income.
The Canary contacted the Department of Health. Citing election ‘purdah’ rules, an official declined to comment beyond verifying the existence of the list.
Tip of the iceberg
According to the list, the NHS was already offloading masses of its assets as of 2016. And then, in March 2017, the government commissioned another report – the Naylor report – which advised trusts to sell off even more. Perhaps trusts weren’t doing so quick enough the first time round. Because the Naylor report comes with quite severe ‘incentives’ to force these sales.
The incentives it recommends [pdf] include withholding capital funding from health entities that don’t sell assets quickly enough, raising government charges for those that choose to retain assets, and bribing the NHS to sell with a “2 for 1” offer. That means the government will match the money raised through a sale for trusts that do so.
The Carter report and the Naylor report justified these recommendations with a cost-cutting argument. The former report claimed [pdf] some trusts’ running costs were too high. The latter report says the government’s Sustainability and Transformation Plans can’t be achieved without more sell-offs.
Whatever the motivation, the effect is clear. Our NHS assets are slowly but surely being whittled away. The government is coordinating this while it starves the health service of necessary funds. And it’s all in the name of ‘belt-tightening’. But these sales have one clear beneficiary: the private sector. And that’s also true of the government’s decision to accelerate competition in the NHS with its Health and Social Care Act. An act which means the private sector now runs £13bn worth of our public health service.
The public, however, are not benefiting. Instead, we’re watching the NHS disintegrate before our eyes. And that’s only going to continue if people vote the Tories back in on 8 June.
– Get out there and vote on 8 June. And encourage others to do the same.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
– Also, read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via YouTube
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.