Richard Dawkins schools the government for voting that ‘animals can’t feel pain or emotion’

Richard Dawkins fox
Support us and go ad-free

Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins has schooled the government for essentially voting that animals can’t feel pain or emotion. The government recently won a vote not to include ‘animal sentience’ – the notion that animals feel pain and emotion – within the EU Withdrawal Bill. The bill moves existing EU legislation into UK law post-Brexit, meaning the UK may no longer recognise animal sentience when we leave.

But… science

In response, Dawkins mocked politicians for voting against years of research:

Dawkins is making the point that science has already proven that animals are sentient beings. A 2013 editorial from Live Science states:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

After 2,500 Studies, It’s Time to Declare Animal Sentience Proven

For a little more detail, there’s the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness:

non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Non-human animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also possess these neurological substrates.

Further expressing his incredulity, Dawkins later pointed out that surely humans would come under the government’s description:

“Animals” can’t feel pain or emotions? “Animals”? We aren’t plants, fungi or bacteria, so that makes us animals.

The outspoken atheist continued:

At what point in our evolution do they think we became capable of feeling pain or emotions? Australopithecus? Homo habilis? Homo erectus.

Animal welfare

As The Canary‘s Sam Woolfe reported, during the parliamentary debate the government claimed that ‘animal sentience’ is already covered by the Animal Welfare Act 2006. But David Bowles, head of public affairs for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), doesn’t buy it:

It’s shocking that MPs have given the thumbs down to incorporating animal sentience into post-Brexit UK law. In the EU, we know that the recognition of animals as sentient beings has been effective in improving animal welfare across the region. If the UK is to achieve the Environment Secretary’s objective of achieving the highest possible animal welfare post-Brexit, it must do the same.

Bowles noted that the Animal Welfare Act 2006 doesn’t include sentience or cover all animals.

Animals are certainly sentient beings, and many people feel they don’t need science to know that. Just because lots of politicians don’t seem able to feel emotion, doesn’t mean animals can’t.

Get Involved!

– Support the RSPCA.

– Check out more articles from The Canary on animal rights.

Join us, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via S Pakhrin and Tambako the Jaguar

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed