Police settled out of court with an anti-hunting activist for thousands of pounds. It came after they wrongfully asked her to leave an area where hunting was taking place.
North Wales Police issued a dispersal order to hunt saboteurs in the area of Plas Heaton, north Wales, on 24 January 2015. Police arrived after a supporter of the Flint and Denbigh Hunt, Ed Lloyd-Ellis, claimed that Isla Humphrey had assaulted him. The member of Welsh Borders Hunt Sabs (WBHS) in turn claimed she had been assaulted by Lloyd-Ellis. As a result, police ordered Humphrey to leave the Plas Heaton area.
According to the Daily Post, Humphrey was arrested later in the day “on suspicion of aggravated trespass, assault and breaching the dispersal order”. Police arrested a second saboteur, Andrew Edgerton, a member of North Wales Hunt Saboteurs (NWHS). A spokesperson for NWHS told The Canary that the rest of the sabs later left after police also threatened them with arrest.
Video by WBHS shows Sgt Neil Stringfellow issuing the dispersal order. A female camera operator can later be heard describing the order as “completely illegal” to Stringfellow and asking to speak with an inspector. But Stringfellow walks away from the camera.
A deputy district judge agreed that the order was “invalid” on 22 September 2015. Humphrey and Edgerton appealed and the judge agreed that the order didn’t clearly state the area covered by the order. The reasoning for the order also wasn’t good enough. The Daily Post revealed on 10 March 2019 that the date on the order had been changed by Stringfellow and in fact didn’t come into effect until 25 January 2015, the day after the incident.
Philip Kenyon, head of North Wales Police’s legal department, told the Daily Post that the order had the “correct day… but the incorrect date”. As a result, Stringfellow “corrected” the date “in good faith”. But Kenyon also admitted an inspector should have made the correction.
Following this victory, Humphrey and Edgerton chose to hold North Wales Police accountable for its actions. And on 5 March, WBHS said the police had “settled out of court for unlawfully arresting two sabs”. Humphrey received £4,500 in the settlement. However, North Wales Police didn’t admit liability.
Police dropped the aggravated trespass and assault charges against Humphrey before going to court.
A real ban
The Daily Post reported that North Wales Police said it has a commitment to investigating illegal hunting. But the force also said, echoing words from police in neighbouring Cheshire, that it’s difficult to prove offences because of the law’s complexity.
Meanwhile, the Plas Heaton situation is an example of the ongoing cost to the public of policing an activity that is illegal. Lloyd-Ellis told the Daily Post that the Flint and Denbigh Hunt had been trail hunting. But evidence for trail hunting, a legal activity in which hounds follow an artificially-laid scent, is few and far between. The Canary previously reported on the impossibility of the hunt’s claim to lay trails.
As a result, lawmakers needs to simplify the Hunting Act by stopping hunting altogether. Most importantly, this will save wildlife from the terror of being bred, chased and murdered on an industrial scale. But it will also reduce an unnecessary burden on the public purse.
Featured image via Facebook – North Wales Hunt Saboteurs
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?