On 7 March, a power cut hit Venezuela after a major and still unexplained failure at the Simon Bolivar hydroelectric plant. US officials used the blackout to condemn Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro. US national security adviser John Bolton, for instance, claimed:
Venezuela’s electrical grid collapsed and led to country-wide blackouts because of years of Maduro’s corruption, under-investment, and neglected maintenance.
“Galvanising public unrest”
would likely have the impact of galvanizing public unrest in a way that no opposition group could ever hope to generate.
CANVAS has reportedly hosted Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaidó and key allies. The memo discussed the Simon Bolivar hydroelectric plant directly:
A key to [former Venezuelan president Hugo] Chavez’s current weakness is the decline in the electricity sector… water levels at the Guri dam are dropping, and Chavez has been unable to reduce consumption sufficiently to compensate for the deteriorating industry.
This could be the watershed event, as there is little that Chavez can do to protect the poor from the failure of that system.
As Guaidó tweeted revealingly on 10 March, “the light will return once [Maduro’s] usurpation [of power] ends”.
Strikingly, moreover, the Venezuelan opposition tried to include “damage to facilities of the National Electric System” within an amnesty bill in 2016.
The leaked memo also conceded that “oil based economic resources” in Venezuela are “used for covering basic needs”. US sanctions are directly targeting Venezuela’s “oil based economic resources”, thereby depriving Venezuelans of “basic needs”. As former UN independent expert Alfred de Zayas told The Canary, these sanctions violate international law.
A line buried in a New York Times article shows one impact of the sanctions:
The sanctions have affected Venezuela’s ability to import and produce the fuel required by the thermal power plants that could have backed up the Guri plant once it failed.
US sanctions are therefore directly linked to the food and power crises in Venezuela – both of which are being used by the US to justify regime change.
Nine years after
Nine years after its creation, events in Venezuela seem to be following the memo’s script. As Forbes reported:
Cutting power at rush hour, ensuring maximal impact on civilian society and plenty of mediagenic post-apocalyptic imagery, fits squarely into the mold of a traditional influence operation.
Though the full details of Venezuela’s blackout remain unknown, it would be unwise to rule out sabotage.
Featured image via YouTube – The Real News Network
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop