• Donate
  • Login
Friday, June 5, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

A court just made ‘legal history’ by ruling for a third time the government is acting unlawfully

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
22 February 2018
in Environment, Other News & Features
Reading Time: 4 mins read
172 2
A A
0
Home Other News & Features Environment
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The UK government’s actions have been declared unlawful by a judge, for the third time on the same issue. And what’s more, the judge has ensured that the government can be brought back to court as many times as needed until it starts acting within the law; making “legal history”, according to the group that brought the case.

Air pollution is directly linked to around 40,000 early deaths every year. Despite this, the government has repeatedly been allowing air pollution levels to breach legal EU limits. But this has not gone unnoticed, as legal campaign group ClientEarth has been using the law in an attempt to force the government to act. And so far, it – not the government – is winning.

Making ‘legal history’

In its latest case, ClientEarth accused the government of acting illegally. This was because the government’s plans for 45 local authorities which have been breaching air pollution limits were not sufficient. And the judge in the case, Mr Justice Garnham, agreed. He said [paywall] that the government’s plans were “not sufficient” and “seriously flawed”.

Garnham ordered that Environment Secretary Michael Gove must:

ensure that, in each of the 45 areas, steps are taken to achieve compliance as soon as possible, by the quickest route possible and by a means that makes that outcome likely.

He said the government’s current plans, published in July 2017, did not ‘require’ local authorities to act – just “urged and encouraged” them.

But Garnham then went further. He said that, in the future, ClientEarth could bring the government back to court whenever it felt that it had acted unlawfully again. This essentially means that the court will now have oversight of every government policy decision regarding air pollution.

The opposing sides say…

ClientEarth lawyer Anna Heslop said:

The judge has effectively allowed us to bring this matter straight back to court without delay if the government continues to fall short of its duties… it means we will be able to monitor the government’s actions even more effectively and hold them to account.

A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) told The Guardian:

We had previously considered that it was sufficient to take a pragmatic, less formal approach to such areas. However, in view of the court’s judgement, we are happy to take a more formal line with them. We have already delivered significant improvements in air quality since 2010 and we will continue to implement our £3.5bn air quality plan.

International condemnation

This is now the third time ClientEarth has won an air pollution case against the government; the first being in 2015 and the second in 2016. But the challenge that the group, and society, has is that judges can rule that the government has acted unlawfully; but they are failing to compel it to act. Also, it’s not just the UK courts. The EU, the UN and the World Health Organisation (WHO) have all criticised the UK government’s track record on air pollution. And so far, the government has done little to address their concerns, either.

In September 2017, the UN’s special rapporteur on human rights related to toxic waste said the government was ‘flouting its duty’ to protect the public’s health and lives against air pollution. And in October 2017, the WHO said that 44 out of 51 UK cities listed on an air quality database were breaching safe levels of air pollution.

The government’s shrugging of its shoulders

In previous ClientEarth cases, the government responded by merely moving its own goalposts slightly. And then, it went back to court again – all at the taxpayer’s expense. But it has form when it comes to ignoring condemnation from international bodies – the case of the UN saying it had committed “grave” and “systematic” violations of disabled people’s rights being a prime example.

It’s difficult to see what will compel the government to take the UK’s air pollution crisis seriously. Repeated legal action, international condemnation and 40,000 deaths a year don’t seem to be enough.

Get Involved!

– Support ClientEarth.

Featured image via Dan Perry/Flickr and 10 Downing Street/YouTube

Tags: Conservative PartyDemocracyEnvironment
Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Theresa May loses majority after her own fake news unit convicts 12 Conservative MPs

Next Post

Schools are so obsessed with exam results they’re slashing the time kids spend exercising

Next Post
exam results

Schools are so obsessed with exam results they're slashing the time kids spend exercising

Victory for the tabloids, as Corbyn unable to prove he didn't visit Narnia-01

Victory for the tabloids, as Corbyn unable to prove he didn't visit Narnia

Old Bailey statue of justice

So many people have been acquitted of trying to stop the London arms fair, we almost lost count

"Fire to the prisons!" graffiti

Prisons don't need improving, they need dismantling. Now.

Four ways the BBC helped sell Tory austerity to the public

Four ways the BBC helped sell Tory austerity to the public

Sánchez
Skwawkbox

Sánchez must act against Spanish police after brutal attack on pensioner protester

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
Composite image showing Andy Burnham, Count Binface and Rob Kenyon in front of a street scene in Makerfield
Opinion

Count Binface Makerfield manifesto would stitch up Burnham

by John Ranson
4 June 2026
Starmer
Analysis

Starmer finds his backbone as he stands up to Elon Musk “interfering in our politics”

by Maddison Wheeldon
4 June 2026
Coutinho
Analysis

Shadow equalities minister wants any explanation other than racism for Black maternal deaths

by Alex/Rose Cocker
4 June 2026
Reform UK councillor Tom Pickup
Uncategorized

Reform promotes councillor linked to genocidal WhatsApp group

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart