The Department for Work and Pension’s (DWP) Personal Independence Payments (PIP) scheme has come under swathes of criticism. But one case shows just how ludicrous the system is.
According to ITV news, 41 year-old mother Sam Adams, who suffers from multiple sclerosis (MS), was told she did not need her Motability car after an assessor undertook the controversial PIP assessment nine months early.
PIP depends on individual face-to-face assessments involving various practical tests. Campaigners criticise the scheme because it is based on a very strict set of criteria. And when PIP replaced Disability Living Allowance, the benchmark distance for someone being “virtually unable to walk” changed from 50 metres to 20 metres.
But the assessment may confuse some. It involved the assessor tickling her hand with a feather (a test for body surface sensation [pdf]), leading her to the conclusion Adams could walk up to the benchmark.
How she came to that conclusion when she’s not seen me walk, she’s not seen me walk up and down stairs – all she did was tickle my hand with a feather.
What conclusions she was coming to from tickling my hand with a feather, I’ll never know.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
It left Adams without her Motability car for almost a year, despite her severe condition. ITV reported she has collapsed after losing power in her legs. But a tribunal overturned the decision. And they awarded Adams the higher rate of mobility, for those who cannot walk up to 50 metres. Her Motability car will be returned.
The DWP had this to say:
The reality is that since PIP was introduced in 2013, more than two million decisions have been made, of these just 7 per cent have been appealed and 3 per cent have been overturned.
But we constantly review our processes, to make sure they are working in the best way possible.
900 each week
According to Muscular Dystrophy UK, the DWP is returning over 900 Motability cars each week. But MPs say their cars should not have been taken away in the first place.
Even Conservative MPs are speaking out. The MP for Wellingborough, Peter Bone, says:
You need it for mobility purposes and maybe you use it for work, but because you lose your PIP award you lose the car at the same time.
You appeal against the PIP award and ultimately the tribunal awards you back the PIP, but you’ve already lost the car and maybe your job because of it.
Mr Bone said the Government should let people keep their Motability cars until they have gone through the appeal process.
The Government could quite easily put that right and it wouldn’t cost a significant amount of money at all.
Assessing someone’s mobility without watching them walk may seem absurd. But the real impact on people is anything but a laughing matter. The Conservative MP is right – this is could easily be put right, saving time, anguish and effort.
– Support Disabled People Against Cuts.
Featured image via Flickr/Phil Long
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop