United Airlines was criticised this week for the forceful removal of a passenger. And since then, several media outlets have been accused of releasing information about the victim which falls outside public interest.
David Dao was asked to give up his seat so that priority airline staff could be seated. When Dao refused, he was forcibly removed and injured. A video of the event was uncomfortable to watch, and went viral all over the world:
Following the incident, United Airlines released multiple statements. The company’s CEO, Oscar Munoz, also sent a letter to his employees which seemed to blame the victim. From said letter:
While the facts and circumstances are still evolving, especially with respect to why this customer defied Chicago Aviation Security Officers the way he did, to give you a clearer picture of what transpired, I’ve included below a recap from the preliminary reports filed by our employees.
As you will read, this situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help
Several outlets have since published articles detailing historical information about the victim. If these reports prove to be accurate, then David Dao has a well-documented criminal past. But people have criticised the publication of this information. Because none of what’s been revealed has anything to do with the United Airlines incident. And people are arguing that being physically manhandled does not give the media license to expose a victim’s entire history:
Also: Dr. David Dao, the victim in this @United incident, is getting smeared in the press. Black people have seen THIS before too.
— Jeff Yang (@originalspin) April 11, 2017
United passenger is David Dao of Kentucky. His past is tawdry, but that doesn't allow you to hit someone because of a business decision. https://t.co/Q28pils58V
— Scott McGrew (@ScottMcGrew) April 11, 2017
The US concept of what’s in the ‘public interest’ has traditionally been less stringent than in the UK. Although US enforcement of libel laws does seem to have recently hardened. Most noticeably as the site Gawker was sued for $140m after it published a sex tape of Hulk Hogan. This is despite Gawker having routinely published stories which we would consider to be outside of the public interest.
It’s hard to argue that Dao’s past has any relevance to what happened to him, though. It’s also worth putting yourself in his position. To imagine being humiliated and beaten, and then having all of your worst moments brought into the public domain as a result. And if you feel like you wouldn’t want that for yourself, then logically you should be against it happening to others.
NOTE: There is a rumour online that the David Dao on the flight is not the same David Dao with the criminal record. We were not able to verify that at the time of publishing.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via Flickr
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop