The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) has upheld six breaches of its Editorial Code for accuracy against the Jewish Chronicle (JC). IPSO also criticised the JC’s conduct during the investigation calling it “unacceptable”. As a result, on 29 November it had to publish the extensive findings online and in print.
Audrey White brought the complaint against the JC following a series of four articles published in February and March 2019. The articles made a number of accusations against White, including saying she’d lied to join the Labour Party and that she’d fabricated a story about a councillor under investigation for a hate crime. The articles also alleged that “activists” bullied Louise Ellman, former MP of Liverpool Riverside. Ellman resigned and left the Labour Party in October. issuing widely-publicised criticisms of Jeremy Corbyn.
White told The Canary that she feels these stories were part of a wider campaign to undermine the Labour leader. She also said the stories contained “smears and falsehoods” against herself and other Labour members in Liverpool.
“A litany of lies and falsehoods”
Between February and March, the JC published four stories written by Lee Harpin:
- Ex-Militant Tendency activist accused of bullying Louise Ellman lied about date of birth to rejoin Labour, published online on 25 February 2019;
- Plot to oust MP Ellman spearheaded by a former member of the Trotskyist Militant Tendency, published online on 25 February 2019;
- ‘Bullied’ Louise Ellman nears exit, published in print on 1 March 2019;
- Labour MP Dame Louise Ellman ‘considering her future’ in party amid rumours of more resignations, published online on 1 March 2019.
White described these articles as “a litany of lies and falsehoods”. It appears IPSO agreed as the regulator found six breaches of its code on accuracy.
“Significantly misleading” and “inaccurate” claims
IPSO’s findings are damning:
- It found that, contrary to the JC‘s article, White had not deliberately falsified her date of birth to join the Labour Party. There was also no evidence that she was previously a member of the party or that she had been expelled in the past.
- Through making the above claims, IPSO found that the paper portrayed White as “act[ing] with an intention to deceive”. Furthermore, once in receipt of verifiable information that contradicted the JC‘s claims, the paper “had not offered to correct these significantly misleading claims.”
- The JC also stated that White was “amongst a group of militants who repeatedly interrupted” Ellman during a CLP meeting. However, on listening to a partial recording of the meeting, IPSO found that “It was apparent to the Committee that the MP had spoken in a consistent and conversational tone; the crowd had not been “rowdy”, as alleged.” In particular, it stated that the JC gave a “significantly misleading impression of the complainant’s conduct” towards Ellman.
- One of the articles alleged that White had faced a “number” of warnings following allegations of bullying”. While White had received one formal warning, there was no evidence that there was any more than one and the JC had made a “significantly misleading claim”.
- The paper falsely claimed that White had made-up a claim that “a local Labour Councillor was under police investigation for taunting a disabled Corbyn-supporting pensioner who suffers from cancer.” However, White provided evidence to IPSO of “correspondence between the alleged victim and the Hate Crime Support Service, which referred to the actions taken by the police in respect of the ‘hate incident’ allegation”. IPSO found that this was “significant given its seriousness, and furthered the misleading impression of the complainant’s conduct towards Labour politicians.” Once again, on receipt of proof, the JC refused to publish a correction or an apology.
- The paper falsely claimed that White had previously been a member of the Socialist Party. No evidence of this was provided. Again, the JC took no steps to address or correct this false claim.
In its report, IPSO also ‘expressed significant concern’ about the way JC handled the complaint:
The newspaper had failed, on a number of occasions, to answer questions put to it by IPSO and it was regrettable the newspaper’s responses had been delayed. The Committee considered that the publication’s conduct during IPSO’s investigation was unacceptable. The Committee’s concerns have been drawn to the attention of IPSO’s Standards department.
“Untrue and unfounded”
White said this ruling:
Exposes the fact that there was a… plot to paint a story that is completely untrue and unfounded that Ellman was somehow bullied out of the Labour Party, particularly by me, and other members of our constituency. IPSO has determined having looked at the evidence that isn’t the case.
And she described the personal impact these stories have had on her:
I’ve had people calling me “Jew hater” on social media. That’s incredibly upsetting. I’m 68 years of age and all I’ve ever done is fight against bullying and harassment, especially towards women. I’m well known for this in the Labour movement. So to be accused of being a bully is incredibly upsetting.
But above all else, White is worried about the impact of these articles on Corbyn. As she stressed:
At the end of the day, Corbyn has fought all of his life against racism and antisemitism. So I think it’s absolutely been used as a political weapon and exaggerated out of all proportion by people who are politically opposed to his ideas. Our discussions with Ellman in our constituency have always been about politics and process… never about anyone’s religion.
I do think that this story exposes the fact that this may have happened to other people. And the idea that antisemitism is a real problem in Labour and that it’s institutional is absolute nonsense. Obviously, there is some antisemitism in every political party….but the percentage, unacceptable even as that might be, is incredibly low.
Others “fed the smears”
White is a member of the Merseyside Pensioners Association (MPA). It condemned these “personal attacks” in a press release. MPA said the organisation “has itself been a target of the Jewish Chronicle“. MPA also noted that:
Malcolm Kennedy ex-Lord Mayor of Liverpool also fed the smears by ludicrously comparing one Labour constituency meeting to a ‘Soviet show trial’ — audio recordings of the event found that this too was “significantly misleading” and that constituency meetings were not “rowdy” as characterised by the paper.
MPA also made its commitment to tackling all racism clear:
Tragically anti-Semitism continues to exist across society (as well as all major political parties) and politically motivated misreporting of this nature undermines serious efforts to tackle racism in all its forms.
It also stressed:
The adjudication… exposes the divisive and politically-motivated tactics being used by certain areas of the press and Labour Party to promote the impression that Louise Ellman MP was ‘bullied‘ out of the Labour Party by local activists. Not only does irresponsible journalism like this smear innocent people, it creates division within our communities and tarnishes the reputation of our city (Liverpool) — a city all-too-familiar with the willingness of powerful and unaccountable newspapers to slur ordinary people (without reply).
“Outspoken against injustice”
White has a long track record of standing up against harassment and bullying. TUC leader Frances O’Grady nominated her as one of BBC Radio 4’s ‘100 most influential women of the century’ in 2017. This was for her work defending women from sexual abuse in the workplace. She said, “I’ve always been outspoken against injustice”.
White said she and others would continue to challenge “racism in Corbyn’s party because that’s the sort of party we are”. And MPA issued a call to:
suspen[d]…these kind of politically motivated press-smears against Labour activists, as we fight an election for the Corbyn-led Labour government our country needs.
The Canary contacted the JC and Ellman for comment but received no reply at the time of publication.
Featured images via Audrey White (with permission) and Rwendland/Wikimedia
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop