Hundreds of refugees are due to commence class action against illegal detention. If successful, the judgement would set a precedent and send a signal to governments that they have a legal responsibility of care to all refugees and asylum seekers.
That would be bad news for both British Prime Minister Theresa May and US President Donald Trump. May recently waived further responsibility for helping unaccompanied child refugees. The Conservative government also constructed the Calais wall and organised ‘Go home’ billboards. And President Trump has also announced a controversial crackdown on refugees.
The detention of refugees is illegal
The court case concerns hundreds of refugees detained by the Australian government on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea (PNG). The government has held some of them since 2012.
Law firm Slater and Gordon says the case will be: “the largest trial concerning immigration detention” in legal history. And it could set a new precedent.
In April 2016, the PNG supreme court ruled that Australia’s detention of refugees on Manus was illegal. That decision paved the way for a deal with the US to relocate the detainees, not just those on Manus but also on Nauru. After the reportedly disastrous telephone call between Trump and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, it remains unclear whether the deal will proceed.
But the deal is not confined to the US, and could also see resettlement in New Zealand, Canada and Malaysia. The only further development so far, however, is a re-confirmation of an earlier offer by New Zealand. And the Australian government has again rejected that offer.
Legal case a long time coming
The Manus Island class action was initiated [pdf] in December 2014, and the legal claims updated [pdf] in August 2016. The Australian government refused to submit documents relating to the refugees’ detention, however. This consequently led to a delay, but the case is now set to arrive in court in May 2017.
The plaintiffs allege physical and psychological injuries and false imprisonment.
The lead plaintiff in the case is Iranian asylum seeker Majid Karami Kamasaee. Defendants include the Australian government, security contractors G4S and Wilson Security, service provider Broadspectrum (owned by Ferrovial), and health provider International Health & Medical Services.
Last year, the Papua New Guinea Supreme Court ruled that the detention facility on Manus Island was in breach of the country’s constitution. And in November 2016, the UNHCR made clear that no country, including Australia, should flout international conventions in its treatment of refugees. These include:
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
- Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
- Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Criticism of Australia’s ‘offshore processing’ programme has come from the UN high commissioner for human rights, the UN committee against torture [pdf], the UN special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, the UN high commissioner for refugees, the UN Human Rights Council [pdf] and Save the Children [pdf]. And several sources have published damning reports on the detention facility on Manus Island and Nauru. These include Human Rights Watch, the UN Rapporteur on Torture [pdf] and Amnesty International.
No government can escape its responsibilities
While compensation will help, justice will only be done when the refugees on Manus and Nauru are relocated to an appropriate country. A possible judgement against illegal detention in Australia, meanwhile, would send a message around the world to figures like Theresa May and Donald Trump. The message? That governments have a legal responsibility of care to all refugees and asylum seekers. And if they fail to adhere to international protocols, they could also face legal action.
– Read The Canary‘s previous articles on refugees.
Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?