The Guardian manages to turn the latest WikiLeaks release into a sob story for the CIA

The Guardian Head In Sand
Support us and go ad-free

On 7 March, WikiLeaks published one of its biggest ever leaks of CIA documents. But The Guardian managed to spin an article on it into a sympathetic tale for the CIA. And it also managed to ignore much of the key data.

The Guardian says…

WikiLeaks called the release ‘Vault 7’. The Guardian said its leaked documents:

focus mainly on techniques for hacking and reveal how the CIA cooperated with British intelligence to engineer a way to compromise smart televisions and turn them into improvised surveillance devices.

It began its article by saying that the CIA faced “fresh embarrassment” as a result of the leak. And that the WikiLeaks release:

will once again raise questions about the inability of US spy agencies to protect secret documents in the digital age.

‘I want the world to know I’m lackey as can be!’

The Guardian appeared to frame its article in favour of the CIA, and its UK equivalents at GCHQ and MI5. It said:

  • WikiLeaks was “vague” about its source for the leak.
  • That Donald Trump had “praised” WikiLeaks. And that “US officials have claimed WikiLeaks acts as a conduit for Russian intelligence”. Without any evidence or a statement from the group.
  • The role of MI5 was “mainly to track terrorists and foreign intelligence agencies”. Which has often been shown not to be the case, as it also monitors left-wing political ‘threats’.
  • The WikiLeaks release risked causing “friction” between the CIA and the private sector.
  • That the “intelligence community” had questioned if the WikiLeaks release was “in the public interest”. But it only gave 54 words in a 1,200 word article for a counter-argument from Privacy International.

‘When I tell everyone that you’re spying on me!’

The detail of the Vault 7 release is vast. But the main points are that, between 2013 and 2016, the CIA:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
  • Created a hacking division more powerful than the US National Security Agency (NSA). And it is free from government control.
  • Also created hacking programmes (‘malware‘) to turn smart TVs into spying devices.
  • Developed the ability to remotely assassinate individuals using electronic chips in cars, trucks, medical equipment and planes.
  • Used countless flaws in software (‘zero days‘) to develop ways to attack, control and spy on mobile phones, specifically for use against journalists.
  • Developed malware to turn every Windows, Mac and Linux-based device into spyware.
  • Also developed malware for use in CDs and DVDs; USB sticks; and via Windows automatic updates. And it made malware that could defeat most anti-virus protection programmes.
  • Developed ways of turning Skype conversations into text.
  • Put its agents into major US tech companies and created malware to bulk-spy on public WiFi.
  • Created ways of bypassing the major End-to-End (E2E) encrypted apps such as WhatsApp, Telegraph and Signal. Which people previously thought were secure.
  • Left its cyber warfare arsenal at risk of being used by other intelligence agencies and hackers. And it also left the door open for its arsenal to get out of control (‘proliferation‘).

The CIA did much of this working with British intelligence agencies. And its work could potentially be used against the general public.

‘Capitulation! Capitulation!’

The Guardian ran two other articles about Vault 7. And it framed one to discredit WikiLeaks. It said that people view the group “with far greater scepticism” since its Hillary Clinton leaks; also implying that WikiLeaks was, essentially, working for the Russians.

Susan Hennessey, a former NSA lawyer, said:

WikiLeaks’ involvement creates a reason for suspicion. It has committed itself to putting out material that is harmful to western interests, but has… avoided releasing material… damaging to Russian interests.

But the paper gave no time to the notion that CIA activities could be, and probably are, a threat to the civil liberties of the wider population.

‘That I was only fooling myself to think you loved me!’

We now know that intelligence agencies have the ability to hack into, and spy on us via, our TVs, mobile phones, laptops, cars, and when using public WiFi. This is all done under the veil of protecting the public from terrorism. But The Guardian made little attempt to inform its readers that the CIA actions pose a wider threat to the public.

The CIA and its UK counterparts have often used these techniques against non-terrorist threats. Look at Jenny Jones of the Green Party, animal rights activists, and fracking campaigners. If we wish to live in a society where the state monitors our every move, we may do well to remember what George Orwell said in his novel 1984:

The choice for mankind lies between freedom and happiness and for the great bulk of mankind, happiness is better.

Get Involved!

Read more from The Canary Global.

Support The Canary.

Featured image via Flickr/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed