Amnesty warns of ‘toxic’ refugee detention contracts

Support us and go ad-free

A multinational corporation has raked in millions of dollars via a contract with the Australian government for the management of its offshore refugee detention facilities. But a damning report by Amnesty International makes it clear that the contract, which expires in October, is a “toxic baton”. And there could even be arrests of that multinational’s CEO.

‘Island of despair’

The multinational in question is Ferrovial, whose HQ is in Spain. It also owns Broadspectrum, an Australian company that manages the offshore refugee centres on Nauru and Manus Island for the Australian government. Broadspectrum in turn contracts out security arrangements for the centres to Wilson Security. Wilson and Broadspectrum have been the subject of an Australian senate inquiry, regarding allegations of abuse under their watch. There are also damning reports on the offshore detention programme from Human Rights Watch and the UN Rapporteur on Torture.

On the launch of the Amnesty report, Amnesty researcher Lucy Graham said:

The Australian government has created an island of despair for refugees and people seeking asylum on Nauru. But an island of profit for companies making millions of dollars from a system. A system so deliberately and inherently cruel and abusive it amounts to torture… By knowingly enabling the continuation of this system, which is specifically designed to cause suffering and deter people from travelling to Australia by boat to seek asylum, Broadspectrum and Ferrovial are unequivocally complicit in this abuse.

Poisoned chalice

Amnesty is now warning companies not to take up the Ferrovial contract when it ends:

Any company considering taking up this toxic baton will be complicit in an intentionally abusive system, in direct contravention of its human rights responsibilities. And will be exposing itself to potential criminal liability and damages claims.

Read on...

And if that wasn’t clear enough, Graham added:

No company should be operating on Nauru or Manus, where the current situation is so noxious that it would be impossible for any firm to do so without contributing to serious human rights violations.

A toxic supply chain

In purely business terms, these detention centres are the ‘end product’ in a supply chain. That supply chain begins with the Australian Navy and Customs hijacking boats on the open seas. Then comes the kidnapping of passengers. And then comes their imprisonment and maltreatment on offshore gulags.

Ferrovial considers Amnesty’s comments gratuitous and suggests it is “being held responsible for a range of matters well outside its scope”. But in the 2016 financial year, Broadspectrum earned over A$1.6bn for its management of the Nauru and Manus Island facilities. And since acquiring Broadspectrum, Ferrovial has made €1.4bn in revenues from the company.


The Canary has previously highlighted how any Australian minister responsible for the abuses at the detention centres could risk arrest under the principle of universal jurisdiction; by which they could face arrest when travelling to other countries. This could also apply to the directors of Wilson Security, Broadspectrum and Ferrovial.

For now, however, the toxic supply chain continues.

Get Involved!

– See just three examples of the shocking incidents of refugee abuse, listed in the ‘Nauru Files’ here, here and here.

– Details of abuse by Wilson Security can be found here, here, here, here and here.

– Read The Canary‘s previous articles on Australia and refugees.

Feature image via Insurrection News tweets

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed