Easing tensions between North and South Korea have got US warmongers up in arms. And their collective tantrum is visible for all to see.
When athletes from North and South Korea came out together during the opening ceremonies of 2018’s Olympic Winter Games, there were reportedly “huge cheers”. Even most of the people in US Vice President Mike Pence’s box stood up. But he didn’t. And his heart was clearly unwarmed by the show of Korean unity:
Despite potential talks, and irrespective of if they happen w/USA or S. Korea, new strong sanctions are coming very soon and the maximum pressure campaign will only intensify until North Korea abandons its nuclear program. All our allies agree!
— Vice President Mike Pence (@VP) February 12, 2018
(Forget that sanctions are a dead-end policy which hurt ordinary people the most, of course.)
‘Evil mainstream media. It’s all your fault!’
But it wasn’t just Pence who was unimpressed. The mainstream media also came under fire from some people for its apparently positive coverage of North Korea’s Olympic delegation – and its cheerleaders in particular.
If North Korea declared war on the US today, I sincerely wonder how many American liberals would consider joining forces.
— Allie Beth Stuckey (@conservmillen) February 12, 2018
The media praising North Korea and their Olympic appearances is sickening. You're essentially saying you support Kim Jong-Un and his regime.
— Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) February 12, 2018
In reality, mainstream media outlets clearly called North Korea’s efforts out as “propaganda“, and even “Weapons of Mass Distraction“. The Washington Post, meanwhile, described Mike Pence as “an anti-propaganda warrior” (as if propaganda had never been a comfortable bedfellow of the Trump Administration).
And in a final blow to the Twitter fear-leaders, New York Times writer Max Fisher pointed out:
Nuclear war or over-choreographed cheerleaders?
Few people would forget about North Korea’s human rights abuses just because of some over-choreographed cheerleaders. That would mean ignoring groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International – which remain highly critical of the country’s record.
In reality, most people who thought North and South Korea coming together at the Winter Olympics was something positive saw a chance for the world to step back from nuclear war.
Since taking power, Donald Trump has threatened unilateral action against North Korea – which experts think would be disastrous. He has also threatened the country with “fire, fury and, frankly, power – the likes of which this world has never seen before”. And he used his first speech to the UN General Assembly to say the US might have to “totally destroy North Korea”.
would have… an intensity of violence associated with it that we haven’t seen since the last Korean War.
The US reportedly committed numerous war crimes during the Korean War (1950-1953). Air Force General Curtis LeMay, for example, wrote: “we killed off over a million civilians and drove several million more from their homes”.
And today, because the US has around 6,800 nuclear weapons and North Korea reportedly has 10-20, the conflict could go nuclear. Indeed, ex-US secretary of state Henry Kissinger recently said the “temptation” to hit North Korea with a nuclear first strike was “strong”.
In short, there’s one obvious reason why so many people were enthused by the show of Korean unity at the Winter Olympics. North Korea may abuse its citizens’ human rights. But war would leave few citizens behind to have rights. So any easing of tensions is a good thing – no matter how much US warmongers tell you it isn’t.
– Join or support the Stop the War Coalition; and show your support for Veterans for Peace, who are fighting for peaceful solutions to the world’s problems. And take action with the Campaign Against Arms Trade.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via Twitter screenshot
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?