A slap on the wrist for friends, but economic war for enemies
On 15 May, a Foreign Office tweet called for “restraint” regarding the situation in Gaza, without even mentioning Israel:
— Foreign Office 🇬🇧 (@foreignoffice) May 15, 2018
Days later, Johnson finally activated the energy that he might have otherwise used to condemn Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians. Following presidential elections in Venezuela on 20 May, the foreign secretary said:
The feeling I get from talking to my counterparts is that they see no alternative to economic pressure…
in the end, as one politician in this area said, things have got to get worse before they get better – and we may have to tighten the economic screw on Venezuela.
So why exactly do we need to place sanctions on Venezuela?
Essentially, Johnson is following the lead of US president Donald Trump. As the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA) wrote on 17 May:
The Trump administration’s foreign policy toward Venezuela includes supporting a boycott of Sunday’s elections in Venezuela, hinting at the possibility of a coup, and enacting harmful economic sanctions…
The low turnout (around 46%) gave fuel to a media bombardment. Politicians from the Trump administration threw about words like “sham”, “fake”, and “illegitimate”, calling the election “an insult“. And much of the Western press dutifully repeated this line. Sanctions, the US and its allies said, were essential.
But this is nothing new. Because there are already sanctions on Venezuela. And on top of the massive drop in oil prices in recent years (and, yes, some economic mismanagement from the government), these sanctions have had a brutal impact on the country.
And ongoing US hostility towards Venezuela isn’t to do with the violent unrest of 2017. Nor is it about the country’s current economic problems. Because it’s been going on for almost two decades now. In reality, it’s about what the government achieved and represented after winning the presidential elections of 1998 – independence from the US and social reforms.
Focus on Venezuela, everyone! That’s where you need to be looking!
Venezuela’s government didn’t stop the opposition from voting on 20 May. The bulk of the opposition simply chose not to participate. And out of over 20.5 million registered voters, only 6.2 million voted to re-elect President Nicolás Maduro. That means only 30% of Venezuelans decided to go out and vote for him. Hardly the kind of victory you’d expect from a ‘sham’ election.
As Maduro said himself after the vote:
— venezuelanalysis.com (@venanalysis) May 21, 2018
Maduro also asked, regarding the Western focus on Venezuela:
[Instead of attacking Venezuela,] why don’t they deal with the humanitarian crisis in Africa: the unemployment, the hunger, the poverty, the lack of education and services?
Why don’t they deal with the killing and the crisis in Gaza and the murders of dozens of men and women who are fighting for their land in Palestine?
The double standards are clear.
Just watch how Western media report on protests in Gaza and in Venezuela, it's very revealing. Where Venezuelan opposition can throw molotov cocktails and burn cars without condemnation, Palestinians who throw stones and burn tyres are 'basically asking to be shot'.
— Grrrobbenkuiken (@Grrrobbenkuiken) May 19, 2018
The worldwide crisis of ‘representative democracy’
It’s great to see our leaders standing up for democracy. But critics who highlight Venezuela’s low electoral turnout – and the fact that only 30% of eligible voters backed Maduro – should also be aware that this situation is actually the ‘democratic’ norm in many countries around the world. For example:
- In the 2017 UK elections, only 13.7 million of over 46.8 million eligible voters opted for Theresa May’s Conservative Party. That’s only 29%.
- In the US elections of 2016, only 61.2 million of 227 million eligible voters wanted Donald Trump as their next president. That’s about 27%.
- In Mexico, only 24.7% of registered voters opted for President Enrique Peña Nieto in 2012 (19.2 million out of 77.7 million). And in Chile, only 2.4 million of 14.3 million registered voters sided with soon-to-be-president Sebastián Piñera in the first round of the presidential vote in 2017 (that’s under 17%).
- Israel’s 2015 elections, meanwhile, saw only 985,408 out of over 5.8 million eligible voters opt for Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud. That’s just 16.7%.
And the list goes on. Yet there’s little uproar about the democratic deficit in these countries.
As long as representation trumps participation, democracy isn’t the right word. Because when one person or one party essentially makes the decisions for everyone, we can hardly call it ‘the rule of the people‘. It would be more appropriate to call it ‘the rule of some people‘.
So considering the poor records of other countries, why do Western politicians like Boris Johnson display such obvious double standards?
'So much to offer the world.' Its oil, for example. https://t.co/yXGAhgtxHs
— Media Lens (@medialens) May 21, 2018
It can’t possibly have anything to do with Venezuela’s oil, of course.
– Learn more about the world’s electoral systems, and decide for yourselves which you think are the best.
Featured image via screenshot
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?