On 19 November, the Israeli military allegedly shot Associated Press journalist Rashed Rashid and wounded a further 24 Palestinians in Gaza.
Although the Israeli military frequently shoots civilians near the Israeli-Palestinian border, the sentence above is rare within the mainstream media. Because all too often in mainstream coverage, victims of Israeli aggression mysteriously ‘get shot’ or ‘die’ – with no mention of the perpetrator. And even after Israel shot an Associated Press journalist, the Associated Press is now doing the same thing.
Rashid’s colleagues said that the gunfire came from the Israeli side of the border.
When the Israeli military opened fire, the 47-year-old was reportedly 600 metres from the Israeli-Palestine border in northern Gaza. He was also “wearing a blue helmet and brown protective vest with the word ‘PRESS’ written in white”.
Israeli forces have killed and wounded numerous Palestinian journalists wearing vests marked as ‘PRESS’ in the current wave of protests.
Proposed new laws in Israel “limiting media coverage of events in public spaces”, meanwhile, cast the event in an even darker light.
Those who ‘got shot’
This is the reality of reporting on Israel; victims of Israeli aggression ‘get shot’. The mainstream media rarely mentions who did the shooting, and the perpetrator thus escapes blame.
The latest example of the media’s misrepresentation of the conflict came from the Guardian. On 12 November, it reported: “Israeli officer killed during Gaza raid in which seven Palestinians died”. Before the deletion of the post, readers pointed out what should have already been glaringly obvious. The Palestinians did not simply ‘die’; Israeli forces killed them during a raid within the latter’s own territory.
The Associated Press
And now, the Associated Press has failed to tell its readers who shot its own journalist.
Though accounts strongly suggest that the Israeli military shot Rashid, the Associated Press reported that:
an Associated Press cameraman has been shot and wounded while covering a demonstration in the Gaza Strip.
Many confronted this all-too-familiar linguistic misrepresentation of cause and effect. Journalist Ben Norton, for example, tweeted:
The Associated Press is whitewashing the Israeli attack on its own journalist!
Note the vague headline does not reveal who shot him (ie, an Israeli sniper): "AP cameraman shot during Gaza protest"https://t.co/Zv7hVoOhOD
— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) November 20, 2018
To understand and deal with reality, we need to be direct with our language. That means saying very clearly: the Israeli military frequently shoots and murders journalists and civilians. Anything else just pushes us further away from peace and justice.
Featured image via pxhere
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.