Activists in Finland sue their government over climate inaction
Environmental organisations in Finland filed a legal challenge on Monday 28 November accusing the government of breaking its own commitments to protect the climate. It’s the first challenge of its kind in the country.
In July, Finland passed the Climate Change Act which aims to make the country carbon-neutral by 2035. But environmental groups say the government had ignored its own laws by failing to protect the Nordic nation’s carbon sinks. Carbon sinks are natural systems, such as forests, that absorb carbon from the atmosphere and store it in, for example, vegetation and soil.
Hanna Aho, Policy Officer for the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation (FANC), told Agence France-Presse (AFP):
The government has violated its own Climate Change Act by not taking a decision on additional measures to meet Finland’s climate targets. As a result, it seems very unlikely that climate targets will be met.
Collapsing carbon sinks
The FANC and Greenpeace, which jointly mounted the legal challenge, say carbon sinks in Finland have “collapsed” due to an increase in logging and slower tree growth. The most recent chance for the government to address the issue was its Annual Climate Report in October, but that still lacked the necessary “assessment on measures to protect the sinks”, Aho said. She added:
Logging has not been restricted, even though it is known to be the most important factor affecting the size of carbon sinks.
The organisations petitioned Finland’s Supreme Administrative Court to overrule the government’s decision to submit the Annual Climate Report without “additional measures to enhance carbon sinks”. The groups said the report should be sent back to the drawing board because it wasn’t in line with the Climate Change Act. Aho said:
Read on...
Prime Minister Sanna Marin’s government’s inaction is in stark contrast to the obligations of the Climate Change Act.
It will be up to the court to decide whether or not to hear the case. In recent years, Finland has struggled to balance its climate ambitions with its forestry industry, which is an important part of its economy. In 2020, Finnish forestry product exports were worth 10.4 billion euros, amounting to 18% of the country’s total exports.
Good company
The activists in Finland are not alone. A growing number of organisations and individuals around the world have turned to the courts to challenge what they see as government inaction on the climate. More than 600 activists in neighbouring Sweden, including Greta Thunberg, filed a lawsuit accusing the state of climate inaction, also a first in the country.
Ida Edling, a member of Aurora, the organisation behind the lawsuit, told AFP:
There has never been such a large-scale case in the Swedish legal system.
The legal action, which has been in the works for two years, comes as Sweden’s new right-wing government faces mounting criticism over lacklustre climate goals.
While the lawsuit is a first in the Swedish courts, six Portuguese youths have taken Sweden and 32 other countries to the European Court of Human Rights accusing them of failing to adequately address the climate crisis. In recent years, a growing number of organisations and citizens have turned to the courts to mobilise against what they claim is government inaction on the climate.
In December 2019, in a landmark case brought by an environmental group, the Dutch supreme court ordered the government to slash greenhouse gases by at least 25% by 2020. In a similar case in France, more than two million citizens took the French state to court for failing to act against climate change.
Featured image by Unsplash/Greenpeace Finland
Additional reporting by Agence France-Presse
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Reading this brings to mind the fiasco of our own Prime Minister, barely taking a day away from whichever distraction he chooses to use as his excuse, to attend the COP meeting in Scotland.
That he was adamant that he wasn’t going to attend, but at least showed up, as little as that action was, shows that he has some survival instincts, but the natural arrogance of the Tory showed in his staying for barely a day!
I do wish that our government could be brought to task over our own Climate Committments – but realise that even a Court Case, where almost every Judge appears to be Tory themselves, or to be under pressure from higher up the chain, wouldn’t get the Government we have, to do anything overt, especially as most Tory Donors, along with many in government themselves, either own, or have shares in, many fossil fuel companies.
This, of course, shows their over reliance on fossil fuels, even now, with all the Scientific evidence of a climate collapse due to happen, and despite their inadequate attempts to show that they are doing everything they can to turn on to more kinder forms of energy for the Earth.
Until we can get a government committed to reversing Climate Change, I feel as though we are shouting into the wind – a rather ironic phrase, I know, but true nontheless!