The government just announced its position on using the NHS in trade deals. And it’s pathetic [OPINION]

Houses of Parliament trade deals
Jessica Gay

The Prevent Donald Trump from making a State Visit to the United Kingdom petition went viral at the end of January. In doing so, it overshadowed one of the most important petitions of the year. A petition to save our NHS from being incorporated into a US trade deal. The petition has now reached over 50,000 signatures anyway, and the government has issued a response. Yet the response is anything but reassuring.

Save our NHS

On 27 January, The Canary reported on Theresa May’s visit to the US. Before her visit, May repeatedly refused to answer questions about US involvement in NHS privatisation.

This led many to speculate that the NHS might be used as a bargaining tool in any US trade agreement. An agreement that would destroy the NHS we know and love, and one that would feed profits into the hands of greedy privateers.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

As such, the petition to Ringfence the NHS from trade deals was launched.

It read:

Continue reading below...

As the UK leaves the EU, the NHS should not be used as a bargaining tool in trade negotiations and deals with other countries.

Unlike the Trump petition, this one received next to no media coverage and only a scrap of the support it deserved. In one single hour on 30 January, the petition against Trump received 46,734 signatures. The NHS petition received only 1,314.

The response

On 8 February, the government responded to the petition. It began:

The Government is clear – the NHS is and always will be protected in trade deals. Our world-class healthcare sector benefits from international trade and should not be excluded.

So in the opening sentence, the government neither confirms nor denies that it will use the NHS in a trade deal. Instead, it seemingly states both, claiming the NHS will be “protected” but should also “not be excluded”.

Read on, and the government’s stance on the issue becomes a little clearer. It states:

It is not in the UK or wider interests to exclude the UK healthcare sector from trade and investment agreements.

Through trade agreements the UK’s world-class pharmaceutical and medical care and devices sectors can benefit from improved access to overseas markets to sell products and bid for government procurement contracts.

So it appears it’s not in our “interests” to exclude the NHS from a trade deal. Apparently, the “NHS benefits directly from international trade”.

Likewise, according to the government, “trade deals do not threaten Government policy-making regarding delivery of public services”. Furthermore, they “do not force Governments to privatise the delivery of any public services”.

But “such agreements do not prevent governments from introducing new legislation to safeguard public health or safety”.

New legislation such as privatisation?

And while the “UK Government is committed in particular to the principles of a [sic] NHS, free at the point of use”… “it will always remain for the UK Government to decide how public services are run and, in particular, who is best placed to provide NHS services on the basis of patient need”.

Confused much? 

In basic terms, the government has confirmed that the NHS may be used in future trade deals. It claims to support foreign intervention, and in particular for “overseas markets” to “bid” for NHS contracts.

While it claims to protect the NHS, one that is “free at the point of use”, recent acts of privatisation show this not to be the case. In 2016, The Canary reported on Virgin Care’s acquisition of several NHS contracts, and new government approved schemes have been introduced around the UK to get people to pay to skip GP queues.

Outrage

The government’s response has caused outrage across social media:

Once again, the government hasn’t given a straight ‘yes or no’ answer. But it is clear in its response that the government may use the NHS as part of a trade deal. Its promise to “protect” the principles of the NHS is as good as meaningless. And its push to open the NHS to all bidders shows it doesn’t have patients’ interests at heart.

Get Involved!

Sign the petition.

Read more about Jeremy Hunt’s NHS plans.

Read more Canary articles on the NHS, and more from The Canary‘s Health section.

– Support the Save Our NHS campaign, and other NHS campaigns.

Featured image via Creative Commons

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed