one of the most comprehensive assessments of Brexit sentiment since the referendum.
These revelations alone have strengthened the argument for a People’s Vote on the final Brexit deal. That’s leaving aside other compelling factors, like the Vote Leave campaign lying to voters and breaking electoral law.
But it also reinforces Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon’s mandate to hold another referendum on Scottish independence.
Scotland and Brexit
Alongside Northern Ireland and Gibraltar, Scotland voted Remain in the EU referendum. In fact, Scotland voted 62% in favour of Remain, and every single council area backed staying in the EU. Since the vote, the Scottish parliament has passed a bill in favour of holding a second Scottish independence referendum. The SNP and Scottish Green Party MSPs backed the bill, giving it a majority in Holyrood.
The SNP received its mandate after winning the Scottish parliamentary election in 2016. Its manifesto stated:
We believe that the Scottish Parliament should have the right to hold another referendum if there is clear and sustained evidence that independence has become the preferred option of a majority of the Scottish people – or if there is a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014, such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will
In March 2017, Theresa May claimed that it was “not the time” for a second Scottish independence referendum. Sturgeon has since stated she intends to hold it when there’s more clarity over the outcome of Brexit negotiations.
What about compromise?
Sturgeon tried to seek compromise with Westminster by publishing ‘Scotland’s place in Europe‘ in December 2017. This document requested that Scotland stay in the single market and customs union to limit the damage to Scotland’s economy. But Scotland had very little opportunity to be involved in decision-making, and it wasn’t adequately consulted during the EU withdrawal process. The UK government seems to have ignored Sturgeon’s compromises.
Travesty of democracy
It’s becoming increasingly clear that Scotland has had no say in a Brexit that was created by politicians lying and the Vote Leave campaign breaching electoral law. This is a travesty of democracy. Particularly after Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson told voters before the 2014 Scottish independence vote that independence would mean the end of Scotland’s EU membership.
The official ‘Better Together‘ campaign, which backed a no vote on Scottish independence, sent out this tweet when Davidson made the assertion during a televised debate:
What is process for removing our EU citizenship? Voting yes. #scotdecides
— Better Together (@UK_Together) September 2, 2014
Unlike the EU referendum, resident EU nationals had the right to vote in the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. This comment may have had a significant impact on EU nationals’ voting intentions, and on other voters who support EU membership.
If the argument for a UK-wide People’s Vote on Brexit is compelling, then so is the argument for holding another Scottish independence referendum. Scotland is being taken down a Brexit path it didn’t vote for. It’s had very little input into the EU withdrawal process and in shaping what the UK might look like post-Brexit. The democratically-elected Scottish parliament backs a vote which will ratify Scotland’s constitutional future.
Take back control
Anyone in the UK who believes in fairness and democracy should support another Scottish independence referendum. And in return, Scottish voters should back the calls for a People’s Vote on the final Brexit deal for the rest of the UK.
Now is the time for Scotland to have a real say in its own future. And now is the time for the rest of the UK to have a People’s Vote on Brexit. The Vote Leave campaigners sold us a pack of lies, and it’s time for voters to take back control.
– Become a Canary member to support fearless independent journalism.
Featured image via Vipi Room/YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?