Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu is running for re-election, and in a bid to strengthen his support he has promised to annex even more areas of the occupied West Bank. This would mean giving the Israeli state sovereignty over what is currently recognised as Palestinian territory.
“The nail in the coffin” for any hope of peace
Netanyahu’s latest move has been widely condemned. For many, it’s not only detrimental to the peace process, but it also reduces the possibility of a two-state solution:
This is the nail in the coffin to a two-state solution or any peace deal.
Anyone who does not condemn this or take action to prevent it cannot credibly say they support a two-state solution.
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) September 11, 2019
While there has been uproar around Netanyahu’s plans, Palestinian human rights lawyer Noura Erakat pointed out that they only reflect what has been longstanding Israeli policy:
“We are talking about a rich area where Palestinian farmers—where Palestinians — cannot access for leisure, for livelihood, for home,” says @4noura of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's vow to annex nearly a third of the occupied West Bank. “There is already de facto annexation.” pic.twitter.com/NwF2oPjJpz
— Democracy Now! (@democracynow) September 12, 2019
Illegal settlements and apartheid
Erakat describes the current situation in the West Bank as “de facto annexation”. In other words, while the area is under Palestinian authority on paper, it’s still subject to Israeli occupation.
Illegal settlements in the West Bank carry on undeterred in violation of international law. In East Jerusalem alone, settlement permits have ‘surged’ by 60% in the last two years. This is widely seen as a direct result of support, and close links with, the Trump administration. Not only are Israeli authorities building these settlements illegally on Palestinian territory, but they are also displacing Palestinian people already living there. A recent report from Associated Press paints a grim picture:
The refusal to grant permits to Palestinian residents has confined them to crowded, poorly served neighbourhoods, with around half the population believed to be at risk of having their homes demolished.
So regardless of sovereignty, the Israeli state is already encroaching on Palestinian territory. But more than that, it’s creating a two-tier apartheid system which restricts Palestinians’ movement and blocks their access to housing, water, and natural resources.
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
Given that none of these are new developments, the reaction to Netanyahu’s announcement should not be ‘shock’ but action. The discussion mustn’t revolve around sovereignty on paper; rather we need to centre the Palestinian struggle as a whole. At a time when international support for Palestinian rights is gaining momentum, we can use Netanyahu’s aggressive proposals to hold the Israeli state to account.
As Erakat pointed out in an interview with Democracy Now:
it’s really disingenuous… to be angry with Netanyahu… and not be angry with the fact that US foreign policy has steadily created this fact on the ground… that the EU… still fails to apply sanctions in order to punish this policy.
So outrage at Netanyahu’s announcement is not enough. Sanctions are one way for nation-states and the EU to hold Israel to account for its many international crimes and human rights violations. And supporting the global movement for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) against Israel is one way in which we can show solidarity with Palestinians.
However, it’s important not just that we support BDS as individuals, but that we campaign to have it adopted as policy by governments and institutions. It’s also equally important that we campaign for the UK government to cease any support for Israeli violation of international law. This includes constant pressure on the US, as opposed to the cosy relationship that Boris Johnson is courting with the Trump administration.
Regardless of the likelihood of Netanyahu winning the election or following through on his campaign pledges, the Palestinian struggle will continue. Showing solidarity towards their cause, in whatever way we can, must, therefore, be an ongoing, long-term commitment.
Featured image via Wikimedia/ Justin McIntosh
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?