In the wake of Netanyahu’s racist campaigning, it’s time for the world to hold the Israeli state to account

Settlements being built in the West Bank
Afroze Fatima Zaidi

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu is running for re-election, and in a bid to strengthen his support he has promised to annex even more areas of the occupied West Bank. This would mean giving the Israeli state sovereignty over what is currently recognised as Palestinian territory.

“The nail in the coffin” for any hope of peace

Netanyahu’s latest move has been widely condemned. For many, it’s not only detrimental to the peace process, but it also reduces the possibility of a two-state solution:

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




While there has been uproar around Netanyahu’s plans, Palestinian human rights lawyer Noura Erakat pointed out that they only reflect what has been longstanding Israeli policy:

Illegal settlements and apartheid

Erakat describes the current situation in the West Bank as “de facto annexation”. In other words, while the area is under Palestinian authority on paper, it’s still subject to Israeli occupation.

Illegal settlements in the West Bank carry on undeterred in violation of international law. In East Jerusalem alone, settlement permits have ‘surged’ by 60% in the last two years. This is widely seen as a direct result of support, and close links with, the Trump administration. Not only are Israeli authorities building these settlements illegally on Palestinian territory, but they are also displacing Palestinian people already living there. A recent report from Associated Press paints a grim picture:

The refusal to grant permits to Palestinian residents has confined them to crowded, poorly served neighbourhoods, with around half the population believed to be at risk of having their homes demolished.

So regardless of sovereignty, the Israeli state is already encroaching on Palestinian territory. But more than that, it’s creating a two-tier apartheid system which restricts Palestinians’ movement and blocks their access to housing, water, and natural resources.

Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions

Given that none of these are new developments, the reaction to Netanyahu’s announcement should not be ‘shock’ but action. The discussion mustn’t revolve around sovereignty on paper; rather we need to centre the Palestinian struggle as a whole. At a time when international support for Palestinian rights is gaining momentum, we can use Netanyahu’s aggressive proposals to hold the Israeli state to account.

As Erakat pointed out in an interview with Democracy Now:

it’s really disingenuous… to be angry with Netanyahu… and not be angry with the fact that US foreign policy has steadily created this fact on the ground… that the EU… still fails to apply sanctions in order to punish this policy.

So outrage at Netanyahu’s announcement is not enough. Sanctions are one way for nation-states and the EU to hold Israel to account for its many international crimes and human rights violations. And supporting the global movement for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) against Israel is one way in which we can show solidarity with Palestinians.

However, it’s important not just that we support BDS as individuals, but that we campaign to have it adopted as policy by governments and institutions. It’s also equally important that we campaign for the UK government to cease any support for Israeli violation of international law. This includes constant pressure on the US, as opposed to the cosy relationship that Boris Johnson is courting with the Trump administration.

Regardless of the likelihood of Netanyahu winning the election or following through on his campaign pledges, the Palestinian struggle will continue. Showing solidarity towards their cause, in whatever way we can, must, therefore, be an ongoing, long-term commitment.

Featured image via Wikimedia/ Justin McIntosh

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. I first visited Palestine in 2004; the wall was already snaking through Palestinian land and many of the indigenous population were being replaced by immigrants. Some of them were from Russia, the US, the UK and France. It was obvious that there would be no “two state solution”; Palestine, in that sense, had gone. The land had new owners, or rather occupiers. And they were heavily armed.
      Accordingly, I cannot understand the fuss over Netanyahu’s comments. The annexation has been conducted in full view if the UN and the world community for more than a decade. It has already happened.
      One state with universal suffrage, anti-racist, non-sectarian was preferred by those Palestinians I met in 2004; they could see the writing on the wall and their mistrust of the PA was as toxic as their hatred of the occupiers. One state- the state of Greater Palestine after the votes are counted- is the only way for Palestinians, including the refugees, to achieve justice.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.