The real crisis isn’t Meghan and her husband ditching the royals, it’s our racist media

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Support us and go ad-free

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s decision to step back from royal duties has reportedly caused a ‘crisis’. Certainly, it’s dominated media headlines. In truth, I don’t give a toss about the outdated, elitist UK monarchy at all. But this time, nice one royalz. Because this drew attention to a far bigger crisis – the UK’s systemically racist media.

“History repeating”

On 8 January, “Markle and her husband” announced they’d step back as senior royals, “work to become financially independent”, and spend half their time in North America:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

What made this even more interesting was that the announcement came via their website and Instagram account, reportedly before the queen or anyone else officially knew. It came across as a massive and brilliant ‘fuck you’ to the UK media and establishment.

In response, the global media went into overdrive. But what’s positive is that people are finally discussing issues of white privilege and the UK media’s abhorrent treatment of Markle. Although the fact that Markle is Black wasn’t mentioned in official statements, it really doesn’t need to be.

There’s no doubt about the role played by corporate media in this so-called crisis. In October 2019, Prince Harry took legal action against the Mail on Sunday for “false” and “deliberately derogatory” coverage of Markle. He said:

My deepest fear is history repeating itself. I’ve seen what happens when someone I love is commoditised to the point that they are no longer treated or seen as a real person. I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces.

White privilege in action

Ahead of a royal summit at Sandringham, lawyer and women’s rights activist Dr Shola Mos-Shogbamimu spoke on This Morning. Holly Willoughby asked Mos-Shogbamimu:

At the heart of this… do you believe that racism is to play?… actually you’re exhausted of having to defend it because, for you, it’s so blatant that yes, the answer is yes.

Mos-Shogbamimu replied:

You’ve taken the words right out of my mouth. It is exhausting when you keep hearing people… deny… that racism is at the heart of this… it’s criticism steeped in racism…

It is not the job of Black people and ethnic minorities to educate white people on racism that is perpetrated by white people. White folks need to go educate themselves on the racism they perpetrate. The reason why the racism experienced by Meghan feels so personal… is because it’s symptomatic of the culture of racism in the United Kingdom.

As if to prove her point, co-presenter Phillip Schofield showed his own ignorance about racism by asking “what examples do you have?” As Mos-Shogbamimu replied:

That is another problem. When people keep asking ‘what examples’, it makes me question… where have you been the last two years? What have you been reading? What have you been listening to?

But Schofield doubled down, insisting [1.10] “I haven’t personally read anything that I could say was based on racism”.

And there you have it, white privilege in action. Not only that, but Schofield also epitomises white male privilege. Because it really doesn’t take long to find countless examples.

What white privilege looks like

As Buzzfeed reported:

The UK media outlets that currently make up the royal rota are the Daily Express, the Daily Mail, the Daily Mirror, the Evening Standard, the Telegraph, the Times, and the Sun.

It examined 20 stories that show how differently the UK press treats Markle in contrast to white sister-in-law Kate Middleton, often on the same topics. From their wedding bouquets to pregnancy and royal relations, one woman’s a heroine while the other’s manipulative, selfish and scheming.

One Twitter user shared a comprehensive summary of this coverage:

Beyond comparison of the two women, the Mail also stooped to more overt racism about Markle’s family history:

Other outlets, meanwhile, took aim in different ways:

These headlines may not always name Markle’s ethnic heritage, but that’s exactly how systemic racism works. As Mos-Shogbamimu also explained on the Victoria Derbyshire show, beyond the context of this story, racism “is a cultural issue” in the UK:

People are more outraged about the so-called ‘race card’ being played than… outraged by racist behaviour. It begs the question ‘what kind of society are we?’

She added that Black people and people from other ethnic backgrounds “are done with having to bear the burden” of racist oppression. But as she explained, they also have “to defend ourselves from the racism” and then explain that racism to perpetrators:

and then be at the brunt of the denial from the same perpetrators that our lived experience of racism doesn’t exist

Markle and Spencer

Apparently, Prince Andrew’s links to a known sex offender didn’t constitute a full royal crisis to our twisted media. Meanwhile, there’s no denying the outrageous £32m cost of Harry and Meghan’s wedding or trying to pretend they’re just ‘ordinary’ people. Nor should we ever forget that Harry once wore a Nazi outfit to a party, and poses with dead animals after hunting. But racism is racism. At least this faux-crisis has pushed the issue to the forefront of public debate, along with the foul role played by the establishment media to entrench racist tropes. This move is probably the most useful thing any member of the royal family has ever done. Nice one, Markle and Spencer.

Featured image via YouTube – Nicki Swift

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I don’t think Meghan was impressed with her in-laws.
      Especially Uncle Andy being so friendly with child sex trafficking Epstein, and his Dad being best mates with Jimmy Saville the necrophiliac.
      Not forgetting Great Uncle Mountbatten!
      I wouldn’t want my child anywhere near that bunch of weirdos either. Good luck to you Meghan and Harry and never ask either Grandad’s to baby sit.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.