It took the BBC 800 attempts to get an MP on to talk about a DWP benefit cut

The Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake and the DWP logo
Support us and go ad-free

A flagship BBC current affairs programme has said it took it 800 attempts to get an MP on to discuss a controversial benefit cut by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). And when it did, the Conservative who dared to defend the cut got skewered by the host.

After 800 tries…

On Friday 11 May, the Victoria Derbyshire show was discussing the cut to bereavement benefits which came into force in April 2017. Previously, as the Guardian reported, a widowed parent would have got a £2,000 one-off payment in the event of a partner’s death. This would also have been supplemented by a weekly payment of £112, until the youngest child left full time education. This was payable for anything up to 20 years.

Changes in former chancellor George Osborne’s 2015 budget saw the one-off payment increase to £3,500, but the weekly payment reduce to around £80. The weekly payment is also now only paid for a maximum of 18 months.

Victoria Derbyshire says that it has tried over 800 times to get an MP who voted for these changes on the show:

Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake was the politician who broke parliament’s wall of silence over the issue. But he didn’t exactly do a robust job of defending the cut – one which was criticised by Labour’s Debbie Abrahams as a “new low” for the Conservative government.

Defending the indefensible

Hollinrake claimed that:

the vast majority of people are better off under this new system. 62% are better off…

Host Chloe Tilley immediately tried to stop him in his tracks:

Really, though? They get a bigger payment up front, but then after 18 months there is no support and it used to be 18 years.

As BBC News reported, around 3,500 people qualified for the new bereavement support between April 2017 and January 2018. Some of them were getting up to £100,000 less under the new system. The “Life Matters” task force estimates that 75% of UK families affected by bereavement would be worse off under the new system.

Unconcerned

Not that Hollinrake seemed concerned. He argued that the old system meant the DWP was supporting even the richest people. But as Tilley noted, the widowed parents were:

going to have to work more, aren’t they? That’s the point… ‘People will have to do two or three jobs. When a child should be spending quality time with their remaining parent, that parent is going to have to work more’.

Hollinrake said that there were “specific circumstances” that need to be looked at. But as the Childhood Bereavement Network noted, 88% of widowed parents are £12,000 worse off under the new scheme, and 91% are supported for a shorter time.

The DWP says…

The DWP said of the changes:

The old system, introduced more than 90 years ago, was based on the outdated assumption that a widowed parent relied on their spouse for income, and would never work themselves.

The new.. payment restores fairness to the system and focuses support during the 18-month period after a loved one dies, when they need it the most.

But while the DWP talks of the old system being outdated, both the department and Hollinrake failed to adequately address the fact that cohabiting parents (not married or in a civil partnership) are entitled to nothing. This is despite there being 3.3 million such families in the UK.

Putting a price on grief

To save a meagre £100m a year (0.05% of the welfare budget) the government has cut support to families at one of the most traumatic points in their lives. It’s unclear how you can put an 18-month time limit on grief. But with the Conservative government, anything is possible.

Watch Hollinrake’s full interview:

Get Involved!

Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Steve Topple – YouTube and UK government – Wikimedia 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed