People are worried the BBC will replace Dimbleby with one of the same old faces

George Osborne, Nigel Farage, Davd Dimbleby, Andrew Neil and Nick Robinson

On 17 June, David Dimbleby announced he is stepping down as host of Question Time after 25 years.

Dimbleby’s departure gives the BBC an opportunity to counter its critics with a radical new appointment. But people on social media aren’t holding their breath.

End of an era

The BBC has repeatedly come under fire for the make-up of the Question Time panel; not least for Nigel Farage holding the joint record for most appearances on the show this century.

The show also has a habit of glossing over key issues:

…or just completely ignoring a national day of mourning:

A new dawn?

Therefore, it’s no wonder people were quick to call for a change in approach:

Same old faces

Dimbleby’s departure could mark a new dawn for the BBC’s flagship debate. Appointing a young progressive host would be a statement of intent from the much criticised corporation. But many people seem resigned that Dimbleby’s departure won’t mark a turning point for Question Time, with one name cropping up again and again:

At least others felt there was a broader array of options:

One Twitter user’s prediction was particularly scary; it reads like a stag do from hell:

Although there are rumours that the stag do from hell could be eclipsed by Dimbleby’s final show:

Thankfully, the suggestion that Andrew Neil should jump into the hot seat was met with strong criticism:

Jokes aside

Joking aside, Dimbleby’s departure really is an opportunity for the BBC to counter its many critics with a radical appointment. The scepticism about whether it will take this opportunity is just another example of its beleaguered reputation.

Let’s hope it proves everyone wrong.

Get Involved!

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via TheUpdate/YouTube, LBC/YouTube, RobinSayer/YouTube, BBCNews/YouTube & BBCNews/YouTube 

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed