A journalist tried to use the England match at the World Cup to smear Jeremy Corbyn on 3 July. But it backfired spectacularly.
Journalist Helen Lewis, who’s also the New Statesman‘s deputy editor, criticised Corbyn for tweeting out support for the team ahead of its game with Colombia. Because, Lewis revealed, the Labour leader backed a motion against “jingoism and nationalism” in football reporting almost 20 years ago.
As many commentators pointed out though, Corbyn had good reason to criticise the media’s coverage at that point in history. The same, however, isn’t true of Lewis’s shoddy criticism of the Labour leader.
The England team faced Colombia at the World Cup on 3 July. Prior to the match, Corbyn tweeted:
I hope bosses are flexible with the millions of evening workers who want to watch England take on Colombia.
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) July 3, 2018
But for Lewis, this display of support for the England team, and workers, appeared to amount to gross hypocrisy from the Labour leader. So she too took to Twitter:
Lewis reposted Corbyn’s tweet with a screengrab of an Early Day Motion from 1996. Then Garston MP Eddie Loyden, who spoke up for football fans involved in the Hillsborough disaster, sponsored it. The motion, which Corbyn supported, asserted:
That this House, while welcoming the success of England’s football team in the European 1996 Championships, deplores the jingoism and nationalism in the pages of sections of the tabloid press which does nothing to maintain the true spirit of sport, but is reminiscent of Hitler’s use of sport to enhance his [sic] evel regime in the 1930s.
The New Statesman‘s deputy editor appeared to see this as a complete turnaround for Corbyn: from a man who branded football-supporting media outlets as Nazis, to one who ‘buries himself in the St George flag’. And she claimed that this change of heart is because he “REALLY wants to win the next general election”.
Wait a minute
As commentators pointed out, however, some media outlets did splash “jingoism and nationalism” on their front pages in 1996:
The 96 coverage… pic.twitter.com/c2x7BHjjE8
— Paddylappin is not a crime (@patricklappin) July 3, 2018
Meanwhile, the Sun ran with the headline “Let’s Blitz Fritz”. And the Daily Star bellowed “Herr We Go, Bring on the Krauts”. These outlets framed their coverage of a game between England and Germany with text and images reminiscent of World War II. Following an England loss, riots erupted in the UK. At the time, parliament’s National Heritage Committee said it:
has decided to express its disgust at the xenophobic, chauvinistic and jingoistic gutter journalism perpetrated by those newspapers which may well have had its effect in stimulating the deplorable riots following the Germany victory in the semi-final.
Clearly, Corbyn was not alone in his opposition to this jingoistic reporting. And regardless, opposing that sort of reporting bears little relevance to supporting England in the 2018 World Cup.
Could you please explain in what way critiquing specific forms of nationalistic populist journalism and supporting England are incompatible things or express some sort of contradiction as you clearly are implying?
— Phil Johnstone (@PJohnstone1) July 3, 2018
Enjoying football, supporting a team and wanting workers to be able to participate in cultural events are not incompatible with disapproving of jingoistic newspaper reporting.
— Duncan Davis (@duncanjdavis) July 3, 2018
In her ludicrous outburst about Corbyn, Lewis essentially scored an own goal. Instead of making Corbyn look like someone who “REALLY wants” to win an election, she ended up sounding like someone who just “REALLY wants” to smear the Labour leader – no matter how shoddy the argument.
There’s a lesson for the England team in its next game. Don’t play like Lewis, boys.
– Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via COPA90 – YouTube
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?