Esther McVey is accused of lying about the DWP’s most controversial benefit

Esther McVey and the DWP logo
Emily Apple

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) secretary Esther McVey is in trouble. She has been slated by the National Audit Office (NAO) over her claims about the government’s flagship benefit, Universal Credit. And MPs are claiming that she lied to parliament.

As The Canary previously reported, the NAO released a damning report into Universal Credit on 15 June. But McVey refused to accept the findings. She claimed in parliament that the report was based on out-of-date figures and that the NAO “did not take into account the impact of our recent changes”. She also claimed that Universal Credit was working.

But the NAO has hit back and it has written to McVey to “clarify the facts”.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

A damning report

Findings from the NAO’s report included:

A ‘reluctant’ letter

The NAO claims to have written to McVey “reluctantly” after being unable to meet with her. But the letter doesn’t pull any punches.

Regarding its use of figures, the letter states:

Our report was fully agreed with senior officials in your department. It is based in the most accurate and up-to-date information from your department. Your department confirmed this to me in writing on 6 June and we then reached final agreement on the report by 8 June. It is odd that by 15 June you you felt able to say the NAO ‘did not take into account the impact of our recent changes’. You reiterated these statements on 2 July but we have seen no evidence of such impacts nor fresh information.

The NAO also takes aim at McVey’s claim that the benefit is working:

I’m also afraid that your statement in response to my report claiming Universal Credit is working has not been proven. The department has not measured how many Universal Credit claimants are having difficulties and hardship. We also know that 20% of claimants are not paid in full on time and that the department cannot measure the exact number of additional people in employment as a result of Universal Credit.

Misleading, or just “lying”?

Some accuse McVey of misleading parliament:

Others, like Green MP Caroline Lucas, point out that she is accused of “lying”:

And at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on 4 July, McVey issued a partial apology.

She’s got to go!

Many have called for McVey to resign or be sacked, including Labour MP Toby Perkins:

Undoubtedly, McVey should resign. But her resignation will do little to help the thousands of people whose lives have been made a misery due to Universal Credit.

It’s time to stop the deception. Universal Credit isn’t working, and the DWP is not fit for purpose.

Get Involved!

Support The Canary

Featured image via screengrab and Wikimedia

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed