On 24 July, the Brexit minister Dominic Raab assured voters that the government is working to make sure there’s “adequate food” in the event of a no-deal exit. This wasn’t all that reassuring, but it was less troubling than the news on 29 July. Namely, that the army is “on standby to deliver food and medicine” if no deal is reached.
People reacted to the news as people generally react to Brexit news now – with a mixture of gallows humour and dread.
No deal means no food
The Sunday Times is reporting [paywall] that plans have been drawn up by ministers for the possibility of a no-deal Brexit. Said plans would see the army combating potential shortages by delivering medicines, food, and fuel. The Times writes [paywall]:
Helicopters and army trucks would be used to ferry supplies to vulnerable people outside the southeast who were struggling to obtain the medicines they needed.
In today’s Business section, it is revealed that supermarkets are warning their suppliers to stockpile supplies such as tea and coffee.
The NHS would go on a year-round “winter crisis footing”, with drugs bought from outside the EU and stockpiled in hospitals.
The article also notes that Brexiteers are likely to respond by accusing the government of “scaremongering”.
Keep calm and WTF?
People were quick to point out this wasn’t the Brexit they voted for. Or was it? It’s difficult to tell when the only two options were ‘leave’ or ‘remain’:
2016: Brexit will improve your lives
2018: Your adequate food will be delivered to you at gunpoint
— James Felton (@JimMFelton) July 29, 2018
David Davis: “There will be no downside to Brexit. Only a considerable upside.” What a difference 2 years of the Tories negotiating Brexit can make https://t.co/0PO9fFKGOs
— Peter Stefanovic (@PeterStefanovi2) July 29, 2018
The full-scale concern may not even have been revealed. This is really saying something, considering how bad things already look:
Sunday Times reporting that plans to publish weekly briefings on no deal Brexit plans have been abandoned because will panic population. That’s the same no deal HMG’s manifesto said ‘was better than a bad deal’. Scale of duplicity in British public life right now is incredible
— Peter Geoghegan (@PeterKGeoghegan) July 29, 2018
Some were unable to believe this could be happening. Probably because Brexit negotiations have been going so well up until now:
‘Army on standby for Brexit emergency’. We are entering the theatre of the absurd. https://t.co/qrfk1jmqSS
— Andrew Neil (@afneil) July 28, 2018
The Daily Mail ran into some issues when reporting on the issue. Many people replying to its tweet didn’t seem to believe it. Possibly because the Mail has previously told its readers that any criticism of Brexit is ‘Project Fear’:
Plans are drawn up for troops to deliver food, medicine and fuel if Britain leaves EU without a deal https://t.co/xMfiJKNLpx
— Daily Mail U.K. (@DailyMailUK) July 29, 2018
Here’s a selection of the responses:
Many voters still refuse to believe Brexit could have any negative effects. This is best shown by Leave.EU using the news as an opportunity to ask for financial support:
No food, no medicine, “super-gonorrhoea”, and the army on the streets… Brexit Derangement Syndrome is going into overdrive! 😂
— Leave.EU (@LeaveEUOfficial) July 29, 2018
Some people have speculated how Brexiteers manage to remain optimistic:
It’s striking that brexiteers who accuse me of scaremongering never have details: how a border will function in the event of a no deal Brexit; why a just in time system will function. They’re like a Peter Pan audience shouting ‘I do believe in fairies’ to keep tinkerbell alive.
— Jay Rayner (@jayrayner1) July 29, 2018
If there’s one positive to all this, it’s that the government has finally planned for our future outside the European Union. If there’s a negative, it’s that said future is basically the Blitz.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via Royal Air Force
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?