Jeremy Hunt destroys the last shred of his government’s moral authority in one single tweet

Jeremy Hunt
Tracy Keeling

Jeremy Hunt has destroyed the last shred of his government’s moral authority in one single tweet.

The United Nations (UN) produced two damning reports about Myanmar (still often known as Burma) and Yemen on 27 and 28 August. But when Hunt took to Twitter to condemn the UN’s “deeply disturbing” conclusions, he only mentioned one.

Funnily enough, the UK is up to its neck in the conflict Hunt ‘forgot’ to mention. So the selective nature of Hunt’s outrage lets his government off the hook. Thankfully, people who noticed the foreign secretary’s oversight aren’t doing the same.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




War crimes

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) called for high ranking officials in Burma’s military, the Tatmadaw, to face an investigation for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes on 27 August. Following a fact-finding mission on violence against the Rohingya in the country over the last year, the UN concluded:

Military necessity would never justify killing indiscriminately, gang raping women, assaulting children, and burning entire villages… The Tatmadaw’s contempt for human life, integrity and freedom, and for international law generally, should be a cause of concern for the entire population.

In response to the UN report, Hunt tweeted:

A day later, the UN published accusations of more possible war crimes. This time by all “parties to the conflict” in Yemen. Its group experts claim that bombing largely carried out by the Saudi Arabia-led coalition and the Yemeni government “may amount to war crimes”. It further states that the “severe naval and air restrictions” imposed by the coalition “may amount to international crimes”.

Meanwhile, it says that various parties may also be responsible for arbitrary detentions, torture, rape, sexual violence, the use of child soldiers, and restricting freedom of expression.

But Hunt didn’t condemn these “deeply disturbing” crimes against people in Yemen on Twitter. In fact, this report didn’t even get a mention.

Er, hello?

Observers didn’t let Hunt’s selective outrage go by unnoticed, though:

Of course, there’s a reason why the UK government might choose to avoid criticism of Saudi Arabia: arms sales. In fact, ex-defence secretary Micheal Fallon said as much in 2017. During a Commons Defence Committee session, he said criticism of Saudi Arabia was “not helpful” in securing arms deals with the country. He also urged parliamentarians to do “everything possible to encourage” a deal at the time.

But that’s not the government’s only problem. Because it’s doing much more in the Yemen assault than providing arms. It’s deployed staff for “liaison” in Saudi Arabia’s headquarters, where the regime’s targeting rooms are located. It’s also providing “advice, information and assistance” to the country.

So, if Saudi Arabia is found guilty of war crimes, where does that leave the UK? If Hunt’s government is complicit in the conflict, is it culpable for the crimes too?

Judging from Hunt’s Twitter feed, that’s not a question he’ll be willingly answering anytime soon.

Get Involved!

Take action with Campaign Against Arms Sales.

Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via Channel 4 News – YouTube

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed