Owen Jones goes to war on establishment drug hypocrisy with a passionate defence of Labour’s Kate Osamor

Labour MP Katie Osamor alongside Guardian journalist Owen Jones
Joshua Funnell


Controversy has exploded following news of drug charges against the son of shadow international development secretary Kate Osamor. Despite his conviction, Osamor’s son Ishmael is reportedly still her parliamentary assistant.

The case resulted in a predictable media feeding frenzy, with pious condemnations from moralising journalists and politicians alike. But journalist Owen Jones has come out fighting for Osamor, taking on the establishment’s drug hypocrisy in the process.

Establishment opportunists

Seeing an opportunity to bash a Corbyn ally, some on the Labour right embraced the old adage: ‘never let a good scandal go to waste’.

Luke Akehurst, Labour right–winger and head of ‘Labour First’, suggested Osamor might have to resign over her son’s actions:

Related articles

But Novara Media’s Michael Walker called out the absurdity of this:

The same media pundits attacking Osamor also complained she’d blocked them on Twitter. And some went trawling through Osamor’s historic tweets to find humorous fodder about her son. But there were also suggestions of a more sinister driving force behind the media uproar:

Jones goes to war… on the ‘war on drugs’

Instead of dancing around legal and party technicalities, Jones jumped straight to the heart of the issue:

Some may have seen Jones as an apologist for Osamor or Labour because of his reaction. But he has form as an opponent of the ‘war on drugs’:

He also explored the issue brilliantly in this video:

Not quite grasping the extent of Jones’s rejection of the media moral panic, however, PoliticsHome editor Kevin Schofield tweeted:

The response from Jones was emphatic:

The ‘you can buy, but you can’t supply’ fallacy

Jones really cut through the hypocrisy of the issue. He asked how many commentators pursuing this story had taken drugs themselves. And the implication was simple: that they had either bought drugs directly or indirectly from a drug dealer.

One of Jones’s Twitter critics didn’t fare too well on this issue:

 

Jones also asked:

And he went so far as to refer specifically to unnamed members of Tony Blair’s government:

Labour needs to change policy, and Westminster should get its own house in order

Just for anyone who may have still thought Jones was blindly defending Labour, meanwhile, he insisted in another tweet that “Labour as a whole needs to shift its policy”.

And he’s right. Because until the Labour leadership shows the bravery to call time on the failed drug war, as others are calling for in the party, it will remain open to these kinds of attacks.

Some Tory MPs, meanwhile, have claimed Osamor’s son isn’t suitable to work in parliament. But let’s recall some of the behaviour that has already been reported to occur in parliament. For a start, accusations of bullying and harassment of parliamentary staff; cleaners complaining of drunk MPs leaving vomit and used condoms around their offices; allegations of historic drug use by prominent politicians; and allegations that the government’s drug minister personally benefits from the prohibition of drugs due to her husband’s legal cannabis farms.

End the war

As the books Drugs without the Hot Air and Chasing the Scream show, the drug war is an abject and destructive failure.

Osamor’s son’s behaviour may not be a good look for the Labour Party. But it must be viewed in context – much like a seller of alcohol under US prohibition would now be laughed at if considered a serious criminal today.

Jones was right to call this out, and more people should follow his lead.

Get Involved!

– Support the Labour Campaign for Drug Policy Reform.

– Join us and support fierce independent journalism.

– Read more of our work of drug reform.

Featured Image via screengrab and screengrab

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

Related articles