A video by the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) delivers a chilling warning about our right to protest in 2018. War on Dissent: the Shrinking Space for Protest in the UK explains how the police are clamping down on our right to dissent. And it is essential viewing for anyone taking action, or concerned about our civil liberties.
Protecting companies and property
As Netpol coordinator Kevin Blowe states in the video, we have rights to freedom of assembly and expression. But these rights are being undermined. Green peer Jenny Jones sets out the problem and talks about how policing has changed since she went to her first protest 50 years ago:
It’s obvious to me that policing has changed a lot. The police seem to have lost focus on facilitating peaceful protest. What they seem to be doing is prioritising private companies and protection of property over local people who are there to protest something they care very deeply about.
This is shown in the violent and oppressive policing used against anti-fracking protesters at places like Preston New Road; or the draconian actions taken against people trying to save trees from destruction in Sheffield. Time and again, policing priorities appear to focus on protecting property and companies rather than our right to dissent.
Protest as terrorism
The film also examines the labelling of protesters as domestic extremists. It explains that the police do not appear to differentiate between peaceful and violent protest – but focus on whether a protest breaks the law. Blowe states:
The police… argue… that any protest which involves breaking the law lacks legitimacy.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
Blowe also details how words like “radical” and “radicalisation” are now associated with terrorism.
We’ve reached the stage now where it’s actually impossible almost to think about words like radicalisation or radical without thinking about the association with terrorism.
And, Blowe argues, this has happened through labelling most protesters, but especially those that engage in civil disobedience as domestic extremists.
Solicitor Michael Oswald argues that it’s “no coincidence” that the label sounds like a terrorist and that:
that’s the desired effect… It’s to try to separate out and categorise certain types of protest and certain types of protesters as effectively terrorists and dangerous to the state.
A chilling warning
But it’s Blowe’s conclusion to the film that is particularly chilling:
If you’re constantly afraid of what’s going to happen to you if you attend a march or a rally then that poses as much risk to those fundamental rights as the state deciding that they’re just going to ban a demonstration completely.
The policing of dissent poses risks to our freedom and fundamental rights. This is not something we should take lightly. But we can counter it. We can challenge the notion of domestic extremism. We can challenge oppressive policing aimed at aiding corporations rather than communities. And through working together, we can create spaces and the support needed for effective protest.
– Support Netpol.
– Check out Green and Black Cross and find out about your right to protest.
Featured image the author’s own
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop