Hillary Clinton’s latest comments have to be the final nail in the ‘centrist’ coffin

Hillary Clinton arrives in Libyan capital, Tripoli, in 2011
Support us and go ad-free

Ever since Hillary Clinton’s dismal failure to beat Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election, her appearances in global politics have caused widespread anger and despair. This reached a climax recently when rumours circulated that she might run again in 2020.

But now, in an interview with the Guardian, she has surpassed herself – with comments as shameful as they are lacking in common sense. They have to be the final nail in centrism’s coffin.

She claimed, for example, that “Europe needs to get a handle on migration because that is what lit the flame” of right-wing populism – essentially suggesting that politicians need to be even more right-wing in order to fight off the far right.

‘The migration issue’

During a series of interviews with centrist political figures throughout Europe, Clinton said:

Europe… must send a very clear message – ‘we are not going to be able to continue [to] provide refuge and support’ – because if we don’t deal with the migration issue it will continue to roil the body politic.

It’s not unfair to say that Clinton has done more to create the ‘migration issue’ than most politicians. Because as US secretary of state, for instance, Clinton was instrumental in the 2011 bombing and subsequent massive destabilisation of Libya.

After NATO forces deposed Gaddafi in 2011 (whose son Clinton welcomed to the US two years prior), Libya became a “failed state”. Many of the refugee boats crossing the Mediterranean Sea for Europe are now full of Libyan refugees; they are fleeing a humanitarian disaster of Washington’s making.

Read on...

Now that the consequences of Western foreign policy are visible in the Western world, it’s shameful that these policies’ architects (like Clinton) are pointing the finger at refugees and not themselves.

Intercept contributor Mehdi Hasan wrote:

And journalist Michael Tracey said:

‘Centrist’ logic

Whatever you think of Clinton’s stance on immigration, the logic of her argument simply doesn’t add up.

By asserting that “Europe must curb immigration to stop rightwing populists”, Clinton is essentially saying: ‘to stop the right, we must become the right’.

This argument was quickly shredded. Owen Jones, for example, wrote:

While Clinton’s argument makes no sense, it is characteristic of ‘centrist’ thinking. Centrism is less grounded in principle than trying to reflect public mood. And today’s right-wing populism is the birthchild of this ideological laziness, centrist-backed austerity policies, and distrust sowed by centrist politicians’ hypocrisy.

The path to fascism…

Centrism is dying. But it won’t go down without a fight. And the more the Clintons, Blairs, and Bushes of the world persevere, the greater chance the “rightwing populists” whom they allegedly revile stand of winning.

The path to fascism, it seems, is paved with centrists’ good intentions.

Featured image via US Department of State

Get involved

  • Read more of The Canary‘s coverage of US politics.
  • See more reporting on the dangers of political centrism.

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The reason behind refugees is war, and no leaders I see dare explain this for the sake of our humanity or in which to begin a discussion about the problem of bombing someones homeland into oblivion has its consequences.
      No thinking or learning curve in the political spectrum/status quo I see, and none coming politically from anywhere.
      Its easy to see why Zombie movies are so popular, Yet this isn’t popularism just entertainment.
      From here to eternity we would be unchanged, but for the outcry from the people unelected.
      A vastly different governance is underway I see.
      Its the change we ourselves invented which is leading us, as reflected in the new social media like Canary.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.