Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez blows the lid on big pharma’s public subsidy scam – and it’s the same in the UK too 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez pictured next to some pharmaceuticals and cash
Support us and go ad-free

One of America’s most radical congresspeople continues to make waves in Washington. And this time Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has taken aim at corporate titans in big pharma.

She pointed out one inconvenient truth for the ‘capitalist’ giants: why are publicly subsidised drug corporations allowed to privatise their profits and charge the public huge fees?

Pharmaceutical corporations: drugged on public money

Ocasio-Cortez has made a complicated issue extremely simple. She asked, if the American public is an “early investor” in the research and development of drugs, then why does it get no benefits in return?:

Ocasio-Cortez received a great deal of praise for her questioning, including this moving account:

Others working in the industry shared their infuriating stories of a corrupt system:

The UK too?

But this issue isn’t exclusive to the United States. As argued in a joint report between STOP AIDS and Global Justice Now, the NHS is also being “ripped off” by British pharmaceutical companies. As the Independent wrote when summarising the report:

The NHS is spending millions of pounds on medicines that were discovered with taxpayer-funded research.

The UK is after all:

the second largest funder country of global health research and development after the US.

The Global Justice report also damningly showed that two of the NHS’s most expensive drugs were developed with substantial sums of public money. For example, the prostate cancer drug, Abiraterone, was:

developed by the primarily publicly funded Institute of Cancer Research and later bought by a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. The advanced prostate cancer treatment was deemed too expensive for the NHS for years. The NHS now spends £98 per day per patient on the drug, despite a generic alternative being available for less than £11 per day per patient.

Such an extortionate system cripples the NHS. Between 2011 -2016 alone, the NHS spent 15% of its annual budget on drugs – which is more than its current spending deficit.

In essence, drug companies are selling back drugs to the public for huge profits that they have already paid to develop. The situation was described by Heidi Chow of Global Justice Now as “nothing short of daylight robbery of British taxpayers”.

A just alternative

As Labour’s shadow minister for industrial strategy Chi Onwurah argues:

When the public sector contributes, it gets a share of the rewards – this should be the principle at the heart of life sciences innovation.

And one Twitter user gave another simple solution to the problem:

Ocasio-Cortez raised an issue that is important both in the US and the UK. And it begs the question – if the state can fund and develop drugs, why not take them out the private sector completely? Medicine should be a human right, not an opportunity to financially exploit the sick.

Featured image by YouTube, YouTube and 401(K) 2012/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Over the last 18 months I think I’ve noticed another way that big pharma has been using underhand tactics to maximise profits. I don’t know if anyone else has noticed and I can’t be 100% sure at this point but one of my medications has had less and less contents in them for a while now. I have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and take 30mg Zormorph (morphine) capsules morning and night. The granules inside them were always level with the centre of capsule, where the clear side meets the pink but I’ve recently noticed that they don’t fill up to the center anymore. It’s not ‘all’ capsules but definitely ‘most’. I’ve been on them for a long time so they don’t do much of anything anyway but when I take one that’s filled properly I can feel the difference. I’ve taken photos of them to demonstrate the difference between some of them but kept them in the blister packs to avoid accusations of tampering. I don’t have suitable scales to weigh them so I asked my pharmacist for help but she didn’t have any either because everything arrives pre packaged anyway. She did say though that all medicines are uniformly manufactured so it’s not a case of the granules being different sizes and she was surprised to see that there were clear differences between the amounts inside. Some had as much as a third missing! I usually pop the capsules out and put them in a small pill bottle after checking and taking photos of them so they’re randomised as I take them. I do this to avoid seeing how much is in the capsule before I take it and hence avoid any placebo like affects so I can more reliably feel which ones have less or more in them. Very slowly over time there’s been more and more missing. On quite a few occasions I’ve even started to feel withdrawal despite taking them correctly! Without the right scales I can’t be 100% sure but it’s started to look like the manufacturer is skimming off the top to produce more sellable capsules. The company that’s makes them is Ethypharm.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.