Following Labour’s victory in the Peterborough by-election, upset Brexit Party insiders let the mask slip. Figures behind Nigel Farage’s new party blamed people of Pakistani heritage for securing the win for Labour.
As the Guardian reports:
Brexit party insiders said Labour’s reliance upon a mainly Pakistani vote in inner-city wards had been the difference between the parties.
On social media, people reacted with disgust:
"Brexit party insiders said Labour’s reliance upon a mainly Pakistani vote in inner-city wards had been the difference between the parties. “Some of these houses had 14 people in them registered to vote".
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
And there we are. An openly racist party. Vile.https://t.co/8RgTgPzu0l
— Shaun Lawson (@shaunjlawson) June 7, 2019
Brexit Party insiders say: “Some of these (Pakistani) houses had 14 people in them registered to vote. It would be interesting to see what proportion voted Labour."
Utterly appalling racism. Wholly unacceptable to most Brits. You'll never beat Labour.https://t.co/8kNo8nkgwD
— Red Robin 🌹 #IStandWithCorbyn (@BlogRedRobin) June 7, 2019
And comedian Mark Steel joked:
The Brexit spokesman blamed their defeat on "Pakistanis in the inner city. Some of those houses have 14 people in them."
Exactly. Until we ban the poor and immigrants from voting, and give 1 vote to each house like in 1800, we'll never have a fair, democratic modern Britain.
— Mark Steel (@mrmarksteel) June 7, 2019
On location, Sky News reported that Farage wasn’t around to help his failed candidate:
by the time he arrived at the count, the prospect of defeat was clearly too much to swallow. He evaded journalists waiting for him at the front entrance and came in by a side door.
He then hid in the inappropriately named Welcome Lounge and had a narrow escape when he left to go to the gents and was almost pursued inside by journalists and camera crews.
He then left the count before the declaration without giving any interviews, leaving his defeated candidate, millionaire former Tory donor Mike Greene, to face the media.
Huge Peterborough win
Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour defied expectations to see off the Brexit Party in Peterborough by 2% of the vote. The constituency voted by around 63% (scroll down for figure) to leave the EU.
In the by-election, the turnout was also nearly 20% lower than in 2017, which tends to be a negative for the official opposition. Still, while Labour’s overall voteshare went down, the party went from a 1.3% lead over the Conservatives in 2017 to a 9.5% lead.
In 2017, Labour gained the constituency from the Conservatives with a 12.5% increase in its vote share.
Labour strategists may see the 7 June result as a vindication of Corbyn’s position of avoiding becoming the party of Remain. Focusing on austerity, public services, and values could allow Labour to win seats in both Remain and Leave constituencies; whereas hard-lining for Remain could alienate too many voters in seats like Peterborough.
The win is no doubt a brilliant victory for those who reject former City banker Farage’s brand of immigrant scapegoating and fake anti-establishment opportunism. The Brexit Party insiders blaming Pakistani people for the loss sums that up.
Seeing off Farage in a 63% Leave constituency is a significant boost for Corbyn’s Labour.
Featured image via Wikimedia – Gage Skidmore
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.