UK’s chief border inspector admits public support for immigration raids is falling after the Windrush scandal

ICE van
Glen Black

On 9 May, the independent chief inspector of borders and immigration (ICIBI), David Bolt, published his report on the government’s approach to illegal working in the UK. The review focuses mostly on the Home Office’s internal procedures. But one group spotted something to celebrate in the 94-page report.

Solidarity and action

On 3 June, immigrant support group Right to Remain said that “the public is turning against the Hostile Environment”. It referred to a section of ICIBI’s report titled ‘Inspection findings – Illegal working and Windrush’. This five-page portion of the report said the Windrush scandal has had a notable impact on immigration enforcement (IE). According to the report, it created a “negative impact on the front line” of enforcement. The report also went on to say:

The general view was that Windrush had fundamentally altered the environment in which IE operated… The work of the Illegal Working Steering Group had been paused as “[the] impact of Windrush had led to a situation where [other government departments] did not want to be seen working with us [IE].”

Right to Remain said this showed that “public solidarity and action” had been a “strong force for change” on points raised throughout ICIBI’s report.

The group also highlighted the effect of high-profile media reporting on the Windrush scandal. It said that, although it hadn’t resulted in a much-needed “culture-shift… at the Home Office”, such reporting had caused the public to find the UK’s border regime “increasingly unpalatable”. As a result, a focus group of IE managers said that, for those officers conducting immigration raids:

You could feel the atmosphere.

Increasing resistance

Right to Remain also pointed out that anti-raid activists have come under increasing scrutiny from IE. ICIBI’s report said IE had carried out numerous “Activist Intel Reports” since April 2016. And it seems that activists have increasingly disrupted the work of immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) teams. For example, IE teams completed 21 activist intel reports between 1 April and 18 October 2018. Previously, there had been 27 for the entire 2017/18 year. The Windrush scandal broke in April 2018.

Hostile environment

Responding to ICIBI’s original report, a Home Office spokesperson said:

We are committed to an immigration policy which welcomes and celebrates people here legally, but which tackles illegal immigration. Illegal working undercuts honest employers, puts vulnerable migrants at risk of exploitation, cheats legitimate job seekers out of employment and defrauds the public purse. Tackling this damaging crime is a key Government priority.

However, the UK’s ‘hostile environment’ policy has devastated people’s lives; not only those of the Windrush generation but people from across the world right up until today. The concept was introduced in 2012 by Theresa May when she was the head of the Home Office, and it will remain a particularly dark smear across her legacy.

Thankfully, the public hasn’t just sat back and let it happen. As Right to Remain showed, public solidarity and action have had tangible effects on IE. So we must extend that solidarity and all be ready to take action.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Philafrenzy

Get involved

  • Follow the Anti-Raids Network for information on direct action against immigration enforcement.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us