Tory leadership hopefuls Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt recently refused to label comments from Donald Trump ‘racist’. Given Johnson’s history, that’s no surprise. Now, people are drawing attention to comments Johnson allegedly made about the European leaders he’ll soon have to work with:
The man soon to be Britain's PM was heard:
– Asking whether Angela Merkel was in the East German Stasi.
-Wondering why the Irish premier "isn't called Murphy like all the rest of them?"
– Calling Macron a "jumped-up Napoleon." and the French "turds".https://t.co/wvdE7lOd0B
— Adam Bienkov (@AdamBienkov) July 19, 2019
The “turds” comment was filmed by the BBC when Johnson was foreign secretary. The producers chose not to include the remark in their documentary. This information surfaced in June 2019, and according to the Independent, the Foreign Office asked the BBC to remove the comments because of “concerns it would make Anglo-French relations “awkward””.
On the other comments, Stephens wrote:
Mr Johnson’s crude English exceptionalism is even less endearing. At the Foreign Office he was heard to muse as to whether Chancellor Angela Merkel had served in East Germany’s Stasi secret police. French president Emmanuel Macron was a “jumped-up Napoleon”. As for Ireland’s prime minister, Leo Varadkar, “Why isn’t he called Murphy like all the rest of them”. Such jibes find a way back to foreign capitals.
These varyingly backwards and racist comments haven’t gone down well.
Britain has a long and inglorious history of repressing Ireland. English racism against Irish people continued (and, through figures like Johnson, continues) right into the modern age. As such, it’s easy to see why Irish people have taken offence at the comments:
“Like all the rest of THEM” https://t.co/bOPtPYPlqR
— Ciara McShane (@Ciara87C) July 18, 2019
Labour peer Andrew Adonis pointed out there could be real fallout from this:
I’m in Dublin today. They are keen to know whether Johnson did indeed say of Leo Varadkar: ‘Why isn’t he called Murphy like the rest of them?’ Er, well? https://t.co/EfBfxbp9a7
— Andrew Adonis (@Andrew_Adonis) July 19, 2019
Irish politics professor John ‘Murphy’ O’Brennan chose to protest the comments with humour:
So here it is: if @BorisJohnson can’t understand and why The Taoiseach’s name isn’t Murphy, maybe we can help him out by changing our names to Murphy?
(Thanks @KarlBrophy for the suggestion)
— Murphy O’Brennan (@JohnOBrennan2) July 18, 2019
One MSP pointed out why Johnson really is an embarrassment to the entire union:
Trumpesque comments like these are just one of many reasons why Boris Johnson is unfit for high office. On Taoiseach Leo Varadkar – “why isn’t he called Murphy like the rest of them?” https://t.co/tqeY5yyrYg
— Kevin Stewart MSP (@KevinStewartSNP) July 18, 2019
One man pointed out why Johnson’s Stasi comments were particularly offensive:
For Johnson to compare Angela Merkel to a Stasi officer when she grew up under its oppression or wonder why Leo Varadkar, of Indian extraction, isn't 'called Murphy like all the rest' of the Irish makes him no more fit for public office than Trump: https://t.co/JDaUcP6Hls
— Robin Wilson (@robinwilson250) July 18, 2019
Perhaps unsurprisingly, however, Johnson’s comments about Macron and French people appear to have gone down well with the sort of voters he’s courting:
While calling out world leaders for their actions is a good thing, there’s obviously a world of difference between doing that in a statesperson-like fashion and resorting to schoolyard insults. Corbyn has been critical of Donald Trump, but it’s a criticism of his actions. It would be embarrassing if he called him a ‘hateful, orange Cheeto’. It would also be unproductive.
Unfortunately, ‘unproductive’ and ’embarrassing’ are all Johnson has to offer. That and racism. We already knew he was unfit to be PM. Each new revelation just brings that further into focus.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?